W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > September 2012

ISSUE-49 and ISSUE-137 are related

From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 17:54:25 +0200
To: public-tracking <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-ID: <2237028.3t8ZZfNrOc@hegel.sophia.w3.org>
Hi all, 

IMHO, ISSUE-49 and ISSUE-137 are strongly related. I suggest to 
merge them. 

As far as I understood, we have first parties, third parties and 
outsourcing/service provider. I vaguely remember that we agreed 
already multiple times that the definition of outsourcing/service 
provider follows in essence the paradigm of the EU data processor 
and thus the outsourcing/ service provider (OSP) has no independent 
right to process data. 

This means for the user, that the party using that OSP is the data 
collector and the data controller. In this case all OSP in whatever 
way would have to set the "S" flag and not the "1" flag. This is 
nice for statistical reporting, but has no material consequence on 
privacy risks or privacy enhancing considerations. I see no material 
advantage for the user, but a lot of very nice projects for 
researchers. I do not believe in Roy's fear that the browser will 
discriminate against "S" because "S" must be labeled everything not 
materially coming from the same legal entity. Even Akamai would have 
to label "S". 

Received on Wednesday, 19 September 2012 15:54:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:39:00 UTC