W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > September 2012

Re: ACTION-253 ISSUE: 119 and ACTION 208 ISSUE-148 Response signal for "not tracking" and definition for DNT:0

From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:17:58 -0400
Message-ID: <50577766.90402@cdt.org>
To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
CC: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>

On Mon Sep 17 15:02:41 2012, David Singer wrote:
>> We still need a definition of DNT:0 for the exception mechanism,
> yup.
> 'indicates an explicit indication by the user that they have not asked not to be tracked' is the tightest literal meaning, but I hate sentences with that number of negatives.  can anyone do better?

Perhaps: "indicates an explicit indication by the user that they are 
willing to be tracked"

Joseph Lorenzo Hall
Senior Staff Technologist
Center for Democracy & Technology
1634 I ST NW STE 1100
Washington DC 20006-4011
(p) 202-407-8825
(f) 202-637-0968
Received on Monday, 17 September 2012 19:18:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:39:00 UTC