- From: Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) <mts-std@schunter.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:10:56 +0200
- To: public-tracking@w3.org
Hi Roy, thanks for the feedback! During our call, we discussed that the sites may disadvantage themselves if multiple elements on a page are served from different domains and declared for "1st party use" while the corresponding same-party attribute does not state that this is OK: The reason is that this scenario poses a privacy risk (elements with undue tracking on a page). I am looking for text says so. Proposals that improve on my suggestion are welcome. If nobody proposes text, then this option is likely to disappear (same with the option (B) where I would like to see a text proposal or explicit endorsement of this text). matthias On 23/09/2012 20:31, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > I only recall discussing (A) and (B). (C) is not a valid statement > because it has nothing to do with interoperability -- user agents are > free to assume anything they want based on the input they get, > including equally bogus assumptions like the moon is made of cheese. > It certainly doesn't deserve mentioning in a spec. ....Roy
Received on Monday, 24 September 2012 17:11:21 UTC