- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 22:31:59 +0200
- To: public-tracking@w3.org
- Cc: Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
Jonathan, Roy has suggested what is the <test> element in P3P. You really want that if you want to preserve the semantics of our protocol. And the pseudo compliance doesn't work either as the server sends "P"or "test" back. The UA knows. It is transparent. I don't understand your objection. Rigo On Thursday 13 September 2012 20:13:51 Jonathan Mayer wrote: > I strongly object to the Do Not Track protocol facilitating > noncompliance with the Do Not Track compliance policy. We've > addressed this topic a number of times now; it appears I'm far > from alone in my concerns. > > I'm uncertain why Roy thought there might be "no objections."
Received on Sunday, 16 September 2012 20:32:29 UTC