Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment

On Wednesday 05 September 2012 13:01:47 Shane Wiley wrote:
> there are already significant issues developing and the C&S
> document isn't addressing EU concerns directly.

Shane, if you want to convey compliance to EU regulations, P3P is a 
better option (it has explicit semantics about that). I think that 
DNT is an ack of a user preference that is well defined. This user 
preference may also get some traction in the EU market (hopefully) 
and serves a certain purpose there (usable consent mechanism). But I 
don't think it should convey EU data protection regulation 
compliance. I think the latter would be a good topic for the DNT-NG 


Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2012 20:51:56 UTC