W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > September 2012

Re: Agenda for 5 September 2012 call

From: Aleecia M. McDonald <aleecia@aleecia.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 14:59:21 -0700
Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-Id: <50F60A18-592A-4F55-87B8-9EAE4071547D@aleecia.com>
To: Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu>

On Sep 4, 2012, at 2:23 PM, Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu> wrote:

> Aleecia,
> I'm often uncertain what to make of comments on the list that aren't followed up.  At times, to be sure, that's been a signal that many in the group agree.  But on more than a few occasions it's just meant that others didn't spot the message, didn't understand it, or didn't see value in further debate.  (An example of the last: my ISSUE-137 thread with Roy about service provider status.)  Whatever the import of radio silence, I completely agree with this resolution approach of explicitly surfacing the issue on a call.

Indeed. That is why I am raising it explicitly. Thanks for your thoughtful remarks.


Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2012 21:59:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:38:59 UTC