Re: ISSUE-45 ACTION-246: draft proposal regarding making a public compliance commitment

On Wednesday 05 September 2012 14:01:17 Shane Wiley wrote:
> Despite that review, we believe that standard to be horribly
> broken and in need of significant repair (or simply put out to
> pasture).

This is my personal idea of where things could move (obviously with 
changes and adaptions and name changes etc)

I see the need for the conveyance of those semantics. Yet DNT is not 
the way to do it. DNT is one bucket, not the machine to produce 


Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2012 21:21:36 UTC