- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 23:21:11 +0200
- To: public-tracking@w3.org
- Cc: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>, John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org>, Justin Brookman <justin@cdt.org>
On Wednesday 05 September 2012 14:01:17 Shane Wiley wrote: > Despite that review, we believe that standard to be horribly > broken and in need of significant repair (or simply put out to > pasture). http://www.w3.org/2010/09/raggett-fresh-take-on-p3p/ This is my personal idea of where things could move (obviously with changes and adaptions and name changes etc) I see the need for the conveyance of those semantics. Yet DNT is not the way to do it. DNT is one bucket, not the machine to produce buckets. Rigo
Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2012 21:21:36 UTC