- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 18:54:50 +0200
- To: public-tracking@w3.org
- Cc: David Wainberg <david@networkadvertising.org>, "Grimmelmann, James" <James.Grimmelmann@nyls.edu>, Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
David, On Thursday 06 September 2012 09:52:44 David Wainberg wrote: > Maybe a > better way to put it is that it is a way for a server to indicate > which standard for DNT it is following, on the assumption that a > diversity of business models, and jurisdictions, etc will > necessarily lead to distinctions in the way companies implement > DNT. ISSUE-45 has nothing to do with selecting between several regimes or even expressing adherence to a certain regime. Can users than send DNT:1-NDL to Google because they require Google to follow the Dutch DNT regime? You're going fully into the negotiation hell. No offense intended really, but it simply doesn't work that way. However nice it would be for the political landscape and however happy people would be. It just doesn't work protocol-wise. Rigo P.S. For the fun: Your DNT is wicked? Please use mine! http://xkcd.com/927/
Received on Thursday, 6 September 2012 16:55:21 UTC