- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:34:37 -0700
- To: Matthias Schunter <mts-std@schunter.org> (Intel Corporation)
- Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
- Message-id: <02AEA46D-5ED5-4C26-9352-836CE8A3C96A@apple.com>
My regrets for this call; I will do my best to monitor on IRC, but I have a conflicting standards meeting On Sep 18, 2012, at 12:52 , Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) <mts-std@schunter.org> wrote: > ps: no need to time-travel: now with the correct (tomorrow's) date ;-) > > Chair: > Matthias > > > > > Main topic: Publication of TPE spec as working draft > - Discussion of open issues > > --------------------------- > Administrative > --------------------------- > > 1. Selection of scribe > > --------------------------- > Old business > --------------------------- > > 2. Review of overdue action items: http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/actions/overdue?sort=owner > > 3. Any comments on published minutes > > 4. Quick check that callers are identified > > 5. Feedback on the working groups tri-state decision > http://www.w3.org/mid/95ECA317-2FF0-46D8-B2F9-52F17CD5F9BA@aleecia.com > > --------------------------- > New business > --------------------------- > > 6. Publication of the TPE spec as working draft: > http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-dnt.html > Are there objections against creating a snapshot of this document to be published as our next TPE working draft? > > 7. Discuss open issues. Goal is to either close the issue or else assign an action that brings us towards being able to close the issue. > > ISSUE 137: > Service provider flag > > http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/137 > > - Report on progress made: > > - Tom raised a usecase that it should be possible to delineate > the boundaries of a parties > > services providers (in the absence of this flag) may inhibit > this usecase since > > service providers would be "part of" multiple first parties > > - Discuss next steps? > > ISSUE 116 JScript DOM Properties > > http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/116 > > Review proposed changes by Nick: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2012Sep/0114.html > > ISSUE-112: How are sub-domains handled for site specific exceptions > http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/112 > - Discuss Davids post: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2012Aug/0046.html > - Next steps? > > ISSUE-138: How can providers without HTML real-estate obtain exceptions? > https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/138 > - Discuss Alex concern > > 8. (if time): Screen RAISED issues to decide which issues to open and what actions to assign: > http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/products/2 > > 99. Announce next meeting & adjourn > > ================ Infrastructure ================= > > Zakim teleconference bridge: > VoIP: sip:zakim@voip.w3.org > Phone +1.617.761.6200 passcode TRACK (87225) > IRC Chat: irc.w3.org, port 6665, #dnt > > ***** David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 18 September 2012 20:35:19 UTC