Axel Polleres
Bijan Parsia
Boley, Harold
Chris Welty
Christian de Sainte Marie
- Re: [RIF][Admin] Detailled agenda for F2F2, 27-28 February, Mandelieu (F) (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: [RIF][Admin] Detailled agenda for F2F2, 27-28 February, Mandelieu (F) (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: [RIF][Admin] Detailled agenda for F2F2, 27-28 February, Mandelieu (F) (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: [RIF][Admin] Detailled agenda for F2F2, 27-28 February, Mandelieu (F) (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: [RIF][UCR] Straw poll comments (Thursday, 23 February)
- [RIF][UCR] Straw poll comments (Thursday, 23 February)
- [RIF][Admin] Detailled agenda for F2F2, 27-28 February, Mandelieu (F) (Thursday, 23 February)
- [RIF][UCR] Straw poll on UC: deadline extended to 23 Feb (Tuesday, 21 February)
- [RIF][Admin] Agenda RIF Telecon 21 February 2006 (Monday, 20 February)
- [RIF] Next F2F: do not forget to register (deadline SUNDAY 19 Feb)! (Friday, 17 February)
- [RIF] Call for presentations at F2F2, 27Feb06 (Wednesday, 15 February)
- [RIF][Admin] Draft agenda for F2F2, Cannes, 27-28 February 2006 (Wednesday, 15 February)
- [RIF][UCR] Publication use case (Monday, 13 February)
- [RIF][UCR] Scenario ofr the Publication GUC (Tuesday, 7 February)
Christopher Welty
Dan Connolly
Darko Anicic
Dave Reynolds
- Re: [UCR] use case response (Thursday, 23 February)
- Re: [UCR] use case response (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: [UCR] Coverage (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: [UCR] Coverage (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: [UCR] use case response (Tuesday, 21 February)
- [UCR] Coverage (Monday, 20 February)
- [UCR] Strawpoll - Information Integration (Monday, 20 February)
- Re: [RIF][Usecases?] RE: I18N requirements (Friday, 10 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Wednesday, 8 February)
Dieter Fensel
- Re: SWRL- political motivated (Sunday, 12 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Sunday, 12 February)
- SWRL- political motivated (Friday, 10 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Wednesday, 8 February)
- RE: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Wednesday, 8 February)
- RE: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Wednesday, 8 February)
- RE: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: [RIF] A Modest Proposal: Work Out Some Concrete Examples; Example-1: CHANGE-BABY-IF-WET rule (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: [RIF] A Modest Proposal: Work Out Some Concrete Examples; Example-1: CHANGE-BABY-IF-WET rule (Thursday, 2 February)
Ed Barkmeyer
Evan K. Wallace
Francis McCabe
Francois Bry
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Friday, 10 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> changing vendor rule languages (Friday, 10 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> changing vendor rule languages (Friday, 10 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> changing vendor rule languages (Friday, 10 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions (Friday, 10 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> changing vendor rule languages (Friday, 10 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> changing vendor rule languages (Friday, 10 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [RIF][Usecases?] RE: I18N requirements (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: [UCR] comment on reference to charter definition of "rule language" (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: [UCR] comment on reference to charter definition of "rule language" (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: [RIF][UCR] Human Oriented Business Rules Review (Monday, 6 February)
- RIF: minutes telecon 24 Jan 2006 (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: [RIF] What is in the scope of RIF and what is not? (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: [RIF] A Modest Proposal: Work Out Some Concrete Examples; Example-1: CHANGE-BABY-IF-WET rule (Wednesday, 1 February)
Frank McCabe
Gary Hallmark
George Stoilos
Gerd Wagner
Ginsberg, Allen
- [UCR] Response to straw poll comments on Section 2.7 (Friday, 24 February)
- RE: [UCR] comments on Section 1 of 15 Feb draft of RIF UCR (Thursday, 23 February)
- RE: [UCR] comments on Section 1 of 15 Feb draft of RIF UCR (Thursday, 23 February)
- RE: [UCR] Coverage (Tuesday, 21 February)
- RE: [UCR] Coverage (Monday, 20 February)
- RE: [UCR] Coverage (Monday, 20 February)
- RE: Expressing Ruleset differences as Meta-information for RIF (Monday, 20 February)
- RE: [UCR] Coverage (Monday, 20 February)
- [UCR] DESIGN GOALS, Action on compiling list (Monday, 20 February)
- [UCR] DESIGN GOALS (Thursday, 16 February)
- [RIF] [UCR]: On the Notion of a "Rule Language" (Wednesday, 8 February)
- RE: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Wednesday, 8 February)
- [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Tuesday, 7 February)
- RE: [UCR] comment on reference to charter definition of "rule language" (Tuesday, 7 February)
Hirtle, David
Ian Horrocks
Igor Mozetic
Jeff Z. Pan
Jeremy Carroll
Jim Hendler
John Hall
Jos de Bruijn
jos.deroo@agfa.com
Leora Morgenstern
Mala Mehrotra
Michael Kifer
Nichols, Deborah L.
Paula-Lavinia Patranjan
Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- Re: [RIF][Admin] Detailled agenda for F2F2, 27-28 February, Mandelieu (F) (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: [RIF][Admin] Detailled agenda for F2F2, 27-28 February, Mandelieu (F) (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: [RIF][Admin] Detailled agenda for F2F2, 27-28 February, Mandelieu (F) (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: [UCR] comments on Section 1 of 15 Feb draft of RIF UCR (Thursday, 23 February)
- Re: [UCR] comments on Section 1 of 15 Feb draft of RIF UCR (Thursday, 23 February)
- Re: [RIF][Admin] Detailled agenda for F2F2, 27-28 February, Mandelieu (F) (Thursday, 23 February)
- [UCR] comments on Section 1 of 15 Feb draft of RIF UCR (Thursday, 23 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: [UCR] comment on reference to charter definition of "rule language" (Tuesday, 7 February)
- [UCR] comment on reference to charter definition of "rule language" (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: [RIF] A Modest Proposal: Work Out Some Concrete Examples; Example-1: CHANGE-BABY-IF-WET rule (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: RIF: minutes telecon 24 Jan 2006 (Wednesday, 1 February)
Piero A. Bonatti
- Re: [RAF] small comment on discriminator "declarative vs. procedural" (Friday, 10 February)
- Re: [RAF] small comment on discriminator "declarative vs. procedural" (Friday, 10 February)
- Re: [RAF] small comment on discriminator "declarative vs. procedural" (Friday, 10 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> changing vendor rule languages (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> changing vendor rule languages (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) (Wednesday, 8 February)
Sandro Hawke
Stan Devitt
stan.devitt@agfa.com
Stoutenburg, Suzette
Uli Sattler
Uta Schwertel
Vincent, Paul D
- RE: [UCR] Coverage --> interchange vs exchange (Monday, 27 February)
- RE: [UCR] Coverage (Friday, 24 February)
- RE: [UCR] Coverage (Tuesday, 21 February)
- RE: [UCR] Coverage (Monday, 20 February)
- [RIF]: Expressing Ruleset differences as Meta-information for RIF (Monday, 20 February)
- RE: [UCR] Coverage (Monday, 20 February)
- RE: [RAF] small comment on discriminator "declarative vs. procedural" (Friday, 10 February)
- RE: [RAF] small comment on discriminator "declarative vs. procedural" (Friday, 10 February)
- RE: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> changing vendor rule languages (Thursday, 9 February)
- RE: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions (Thursday, 9 February)
- RE: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> changing vendor rule languages (Thursday, 9 February)
- RE: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions (Thursday, 9 February)
- RE: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> changing vendor rule languages (Thursday, 9 February)
- RE: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> changing vendor rule languages (Thursday, 9 February)
- RE: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> changing vendor rule languages (Thursday, 9 February)
- RE: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions (Wednesday, 8 February)
- RE: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions (Wednesday, 8 February)
- RE: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited): subset of all rule languages (Wednesday, 8 February)
- RE: [RIF][SWC] ACTION: JosDeBruijn create a wiki pageexplainingthe issue with bNode semantic [DONE] (Tuesday, 7 February)
- RE: [RIF][SWC] ACTION: JosDeBruijn create a wiki page explainingthe issue with bNode semantic [DONE] (Tuesday, 7 February)
- RE: [RIF][Admin] Paul V on call today... (Tuesday, 7 February)
- [RIF][Use Cases] Scenario for the Portability of rules between vendor products (Tuesday, 7 February)
- RE: [RIF][SWC] ACTION: JosDeBruijn create a wiki page explaining the issue with bNode semantic [DONE] (Tuesday, 7 February)
- [RIF][Usecases?] RE: I18N requirements (Monday, 6 February)
- RE: RIF liason to Web Services Choreography? (Friday, 3 February)
- RE: [RIF] A Modest Proposal: Work Out Some Concrete Examples; --> complex language support (Friday, 3 February)
- RE: [RIF] A Modest Proposal: Work Out Some Concrete Examples --> Program IF (Thursday, 2 February)
Last message date: Tuesday, 28 February 2006 19:36:12 UTC