- From: Francis McCabe <frankmccabe@mac.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 20:20:00 -0800
- To: Dieter Fensel <dieter.fensel@deri.org>
- Cc: public-rif-wg@w3.org
If this really is the goal, then YARL had better have an extremely simple semantics, syntax etc. That rules out (sic) translation from more complex rule languages (including my own). Losing semantics is not acceptable in the web environment. Frank On Feb 1, 2006, at 7:34 PM, Dieter Fensel wrote: > At 01:31 02.02.2006 +0000, Francis McCabe wrote: > >> 1. define Yet Another Rule Language. Of course, this is fun to do; >> but we already have so many of them. > > We may have many rule languages but only very few of them are > properly aligned > with web principles and existing web standards. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Dieter Fensel, http://www.deri.org/ > Tel.: +43-512-5076485/8 > Skype: dieterfensel >
Received on Thursday, 2 February 2006 04:20:15 UTC