- From: Dieter Fensel <dieter.fensel@deri.org>
- Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 21:25:34 +0100
- To: bonatti@na.infn.it,Francois Bry <bry@ifi.lmu.de>, Gerd Wagner <wagnerg@tu-cottbus.de>
- Cc: edbark@nist.gov,public-rif-wg@w3.org
At 14:21 09.02.2006 +0100, Piero A. Bonatti wrote: >+1 !!!!!!!!!! > >On Thursday 09 February 2006 08:55, Francois Bry wrote: > > By the way, this applies as well of many W3C recomm endations, as the > > following examples show: > > > > a. the XPath processors developped in industry are all hardly usable > > because they are exponential. Academic researtc h has recentlly shown > > that polynomial evaluation is possible. > > > > b. implementing XQuery still is the subject of academic research and far > > way from being solved. > > > > c. RDF bnodes are a serious challenge for efficient reasoning which, to > > the best of my knowledge, is far from being solved. > > Indeed, this is something very stupid about RDF. Why is this a recommendation to repeat similar mistakes for RIF? ---------------------------------------------------------------- Dieter Fensel, http://www.deri.org/ Tel.: +43-512-5076485/8 Skype: dieterfensel
Received on Thursday, 9 February 2006 20:52:43 UTC