- From: Ginsberg, Allen <AGINSBERG@imc.mitre.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 11:17:52 -0500
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@inf.unibz.it>, <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Peter, This section is not supposed to be part of what we are voting on (yet). I assume that the only part of the document to be released publicly will be section 2. Section 1 is certainly not meant to be definitive of anything at this point. Allen -----Original Message----- From: public-rif-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rif-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Peter F. Patel-Schneider Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 11:13 AM To: public-rif-wg@w3.org Subject: [UCR] comments on Section 1 of 15 Feb draft of RIF UCR On going through Section 1 of 15 Feb draft of RIF UCR at http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/ucr/draft-20060215 I came up with two issues: 1/ This section appears to assume that an "executable rule language" uses the same language for statements and queries. I believe that this is not the case for most rule systems that exist today. 2/ The section states Rather the RIF includes a framework of concepts, represented as tags in a markup language I do not believe that there is yet any consensus as to whether the RIF will include a "framework of concepts", let alone represent them as "tags in a markup language". peter
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2006 16:18:16 UTC