- From: Francois Bry <bry@ifi.lmu.de>
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 09:11:01 +0100
- Cc: public-rif-wg@w3.org
Dieter Fensel wrote: >>>By the way, this applies as well of many W3C recomm endations, as the >>>following examples show: >>> >>>a. the XPath processors developped in industry are all hardly usable >>>because they are exponential. Academic researtc h has recentlly shown >>>that polynomial evaluation is possible. >>> >>>b. implementing XQuery still is the subject of academic research and far >>>way from being solved. >>> >>>c. RDF bnodes are a serious challenge for efficient reasoning which, to >>>the best of my knowledge, is far from being solved. >>> >>> >>> > >Indeed, this is something very stupid about RDF. Why is this a recommendation >to repeat similar mistakes for RIF? > > It is not. It ius a correction of the incorrected statement that W3C recommendation only refer to perflectly worked out technologies someone made. -- Francois
Received on Friday, 10 February 2006 08:11:07 UTC