- From: Dieter Fensel <dieter.fensel@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 15:46:11 +0100
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@inf.unibz.it>, public-rif-wg@w3.org
At 09:09 AM 2/8/2006 -0500, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > > Why? We do not need a rule language that covers any possible feature > but one > > that covers 80% of the stuff that is used and useful. > >Hmm. A RIF that covers 80% of what is used and useful might actually be >totally useless, as almost every rule-set might include something that the RIF >doesn't handle. So what? You may loose something that is not very common. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Dieter Fensel, http://www.deri.org/ Tel.: +43-512-5076485/8 Skype: dieterfensel
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2006 14:46:31 UTC