- From: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:43:02 +0100
- To: "Ginsberg, Allen" <aginsberg@mitre.org>, "David Z. Hirtle" <david.hirtle@unb.ca>, public-rif-wg@w3.org
David, I edited the alternative version of the text for GUC "publication", to simplify it wrt the SKOC and FOAF examples (per your remarks last week). The benefit I see in using the "brain ontology" example over the SKOS+FOAF ones to illustrate the "publication" UC, is that is has both aspects (specifying the meaning of a vocabulary, as in the SKOS example, and specifying how to use the data, as in the FOAF example, as well). The point is that the "brain ontology" example makes it clear that it is one single use case, indeed, and not two different ones artificially put together. But I also like the idea of pointing to examples showing that you can have only one of the aspects, too; which is why I support having a short paragraph for the SKOS and the FOAF examples as well (plus, they are great because they are so simple). Anyway, here it is: http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/RIFUCR_-_Use_Cases_-_Publication2 Christian
Received on Monday, 13 February 2006 21:49:31 UTC