- From: Dieter Fensel <dieter.fensel@deri.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 06:25:09 +0100
- To: Francis McCabe <frankmccabe@mac.com>
- Cc: public-rif-wg@w3.org
Dear Frank, whereas I could stay with the fact that RIF rules out translation from your own complex language I can unfortunately not confirm simple syntax and semantics of XML, RDF, and OWL. Dieter At 20:20 01.02.2006 -0800, Francis McCabe wrote: >If this really is the goal, then YARL had better have an extremely >simple semantics, syntax etc. That rules out (sic) translation from >more complex rule languages (including my own). Losing semantics is >not acceptable in the web environment. > >Frank >On Feb 1, 2006, at 7:34 PM, Dieter Fensel wrote: > >>At 01:31 02.02.2006 +0000, Francis McCabe wrote: >> >>>1. define Yet Another Rule Language. Of course, this is fun to do; >>>but we already have so many of them. >> >>We may have many rule languages but only very few of them are >>properly aligned >>with web principles and existing web standards. >>---------------------------------------------------------------- >>Dieter Fensel, http://www.deri.org/ >>Tel.: +43-512-5076485/8 >>Skype: dieterfensel > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- Dieter Fensel, http://www.deri.org/ Tel.: +43-512-5076485/8 Skype: dieterfensel
Received on Thursday, 2 February 2006 05:25:30 UTC