Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited)

From: Dieter Fensel <dieter.fensel@deri.org>
Subject: Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited)
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 15:46:11 +0100

> At 09:09 AM 2/8/2006 -0500, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> > > Why? We do not need a rule language that covers any possible feature 
> > but one
> > > that covers 80% of the stuff that is used and useful.
> >
> >Hmm.  A RIF that covers 80% of what is used and useful might actually be
> >totally useless, as almost every rule-set might include something that the RIF
> >doesn't handle.
> 
> 
> So what? You may loose something that is not very common.
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Dieter Fensel, http://www.deri.org/

Hmm.  I would not look on a program translator that skipped part of most
programs that it translated with great favour.

peter

Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2006 20:44:05 UTC