Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions from Piero A. Bonatti on 2006-02-09 (public-rif-wg@w3.org from February 2006)

From: Piero A. Bonatti <bonatti@na.infn.it>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 20:43:53 +0100
To: "Vincent, Paul D" <PaulVincent@fairisaac.com>, <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <200602092043.53736.bonatti@na.infn.it>

On Thursday 09 February 2006 19:33, Vincent, Paul D wrote:
> Actually - I don't care much about what I consider the "advanced future"
> rules topics unless they are considered compulsory.

I'll have to live with that.  on my side I don't care much about a priori 
restrictions unless they clearly bring some tangible benefit

> is this a good reason for leaving this kind of problems out of scope?
>
> Well, if there is no use case for it, then yes I would consider it out
> of scope. 

this sounds much better than "Fair Isaac products can't do it"

looking forward to discuss the technical part of rule interchange,

piero

Received on Thursday, 9 February 2006 19:43:51 UTC