- From: Vincent, Paul D <PaulVincent@fairisaac.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 05:41:10 -0800
- To: "Jos de Bruijn" <jos.debruijn@deri.org>, <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
A few qus: 1. Wondering why this is an issue: would it be useful to add some links on the general issues of mapping RDF to/from the more common IT data models eg XML? [Many commercial rule representations interpret XML/XST models as "object models" rather than supporting RDF directly]. 2. Presumably the issue of RDF comes up in whether or not RIF will also handle interchange of data representation mechanisms (eg XML vs RDF) as well as expression and general rule semantics. [Will I need to interchange between a rule defined against RDF data with a rule defined against some XML data?]. Thx. Paul Vincent Fair Isaac Blaze Advisor --- Business Rule Management OMG Standards for Business Rules, PRR & BPMI mobile: +44 (0)781 493 7229 ... office: +44 (0)20 7871 7229 -----Original Message----- From: public-rif-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rif-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jos de Bruijn Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 7:21 PM To: public-rif-wg@w3.org Subject: [RIF][SWC] ACTION: JosDeBruijn create a wiki page explaining the issue with bNode semantic [DONE] >From the actions in the last telecon: [PENDING] ACTION: JosDeBruijn create a wiki page explaining the issue with bNode semantics and summarize the possible solutions which have come up during the discussions on the mailing list [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/01/31-rif-minutes.html#action15] is DONE. Find the Wiki page here: http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/bNode_Semantics I created a link from the RDF_Compatibility page. Comments are very welcome! Best, Jos -- Jos de Bruijn, http://www.debruijn.net/ +43 512 507 6475 jos.debruijn@deri.org DERI http://www.deri.org/ ---------------------------------------------- Knowledge is power. - Sir Francis Bacon
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2006 13:41:18 UTC