public-prov-wg@w3.org from October 2012 by author

Craig M Trim

• Re: prov-wg: Vote on Exit Criteria (Monday, 29 October)

Curt Tilmes

• Re: prov-wg: Vote on Exit Criteria (Monday, 29 October)
• Re: Provenance specs: have we lost sight of the goal? (Wednesday, 10 October)

Daniel Garijo

• Re: prov-wg: Vote on Exit Criteria (Monday, 29 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-472 (Feedback_IH): Review of the DC-NOTE by Ivan Herman [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] (Sunday, 28 October)
• Re: Provenance specs: have we lost sight of the goal? (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-472 (Feedback_IH): Review of the DC-NOTE by Ivan Herman [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: acknowledging PROV responses (ISSUE-516) (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-472 (Feedback_IH): Review of the DC-NOTE by Ivan Herman [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-472 (Feedback_IH): Review of the DC-NOTE by Ivan Herman [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: prov-wg: Minutes of the October 18, 2012 Telecon (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-446: prov:involvee not documented in PROV-O [PROV-O HTML] (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-446: prov:involvee not documented in PROV-O [PROV-O HTML] (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-462 (entity-definition-precision): Definition o entity may be too liberal [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-472 (Feedback_IH): Review of the DC-NOTE by Ivan Herman [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: [PROV-O] Proposed OWL change: Dealing with Issue 568 (hadRole) (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-568 (hadRole-domain): domain of prov:hadRole [Ontology] (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-567 (Link-to-inverse-prop-missing): The link ti the inverse property file is missing in the ontology [PROV-O HTML] (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-402 (Feedback_SM): Feedback on the feedback from Simon Miles [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] (Monday, 22 October)
• Re: [PROV-O] Proposed OWL change: Dealing with Issue 568 (hadRole) (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-446: prov:involvee not documented in PROV-O [PROV-O HTML] (Friday, 19 October)
• [PROV-O] Proposed OWL change: Dealing with Issue 568 (hadRole) (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 10 October 2012 (Wednesday, 10 October)

Freimuth, Robert, Ph.D.

• RE: Provenance specs: have we lost sight of the goal? (Wednesday, 10 October)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-515: Data Model Section 5.1.8 [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 3 October)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-530: Data Model Section 5.7.2 (Table 6) [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 3 October)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-520: Data Model Section 5.3.1 [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 3 October)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-520: Data Model Section 5.3.1 [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 3 October)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-521: Data Model Section 5.3.3 [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 3 October)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-516: Data Model Section 5.2.1 [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 3 October)

Graham Klyne

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-573 (mime-type): mime type registration feedback [prov-n] (Sunday, 21 October)
• Re: RDF WG responses (Sunday, 21 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-496: ivan's feedback on prov-n LC [prov-n] (Sunday, 21 October)
• Re: alternate of and sambas (Sunday, 14 October)
• Re: alternate of and sambas (Sunday, 14 October)
• Provenance specs: have we lost sight of the goal? (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 10 October 2012 (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-565 (rdfa-check): Do the suggested way of pointing to provenance work in rdfa [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Saturday, 6 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-565 (rdfa-check): Do the suggested way of pointing to provenance work in rdfa [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Saturday, 6 October)
• Re: prov-wg - Telcon Agenda October 3, 2012 (Friday, 5 October)

Hua, Hook (388C)

• Re: Updates to PROV-XML Note draft. (Tuesday, 30 October)

Huynh T.D.

• Test cases for PROV-CONSTRAINTS (Wednesday, 17 October)

Ivan Herman

• Re: Comments on the Prov Primer (Wednesday, 31 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-573 (mime-type): mime type registration feedback [prov-n] (Tuesday, 30 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-472 (Feedback_IH): Review of the DC-NOTE by Ivan Herman [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] (Monday, 29 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-472 (Feedback_IH): Review of the DC-NOTE by Ivan Herman [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: Presentation on Prov yesterday (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-472 (Feedback_IH): Review of the DC-NOTE by Ivan Herman [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-576: logical definition and comments on prov-constratins [prov-dm-constraints] (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-495: ivan's feedback on prov-dm LC [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-472 (Feedback_IH): Review of the DC-NOTE by Ivan Herman [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] (Tuesday, 23 October)
• RDF WG responses (Thursday, 18 October)
• Fwd: clock change reminder; 28-Oct to 4-Nov (Thursday, 18 October)
• Re: prov-wg Telcon Agenda Oct. 18, 2012 (Thursday, 18 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-496: ivan's feedback on prov-n LC [prov-n] (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-573 (mime-type): mime type registration feedback [prov-n] (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: Compliance with PROV-N (related to PROV-ISSUE-496: ivan's feedback on prov-n LC [prov-n]) (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-496: ivan's feedback on prov-n LC [prov-n] (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Fwd: New public IRC server refuses passwords (Monday, 15 October)
• Admin for the F2F: please make sure you register (Friday, 12 October)
• Presentation on Prov yesterday (Wednesday, 10 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-565 (rdfa-check): Do the suggested way of pointing to provenance work in rdfa [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Sunday, 7 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-565 (rdfa-check): Do the suggested way of pointing to provenance work in rdfa [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Sunday, 7 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-565 (rdfa-check): Do the suggested way of pointing to provenance work in rdfa [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Saturday, 6 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-565 (rdfa-check): Do the suggested way of pointing to provenance work in rdfa [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Friday, 5 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-565 (rdfa-check): Do the suggested way of pointing to provenance work in rdfa [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Monday, 1 October)
• Re: Editorial error in the primer (Monday, 1 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-565 (rdfa-check): Do the suggested way of pointing to provenance work in rdfa [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Monday, 1 October)
• Re: Editorial error in the primer (Monday, 1 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-565 (rdfa-check): Do the suggested way of pointing to provenance work in rdfa [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Monday, 1 October)
• Re: Editorial error in the primer (Monday, 1 October)

James Cheney

• Re: Reminder: Review of responses to PROV-CONSTRAINTS public comments (Wednesday, 31 October)
• Reminder: Review of responses to PROV-CONSTRAINTS public comments (Wednesday, 31 October)
• Re: prov-wg: Vote on Exit Criteria (Monday, 29 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-560: type overlap question [prov-dm-constraints] (Monday, 29 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-490 (prov-constraints-lc-editorial): PROV-CONSTRAINTS pre-Last Call editorial issues [prov-dm-constraints] (Monday, 29 October)
• Review of PROV-CONSTRAINTS issues (ISSUE-576, ISSUE-580, ISSUE-577, ISSUE-578, ISSUE-581) (Monday, 29 October)
• Review of PROV-CONSTRAINTS issues (ISSUE-582, ISSUE-579, ISSUE-585, ISSUE-583) (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-556 (time-qualification): public comment: should qualfied and unqualified versions the same [prov-dm-constraints] (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-560: type overlap question [prov-dm-constraints] (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-559: For delegation, two agents need to have some overlap in their lifetime. [prov-dm-constraints] (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-575: identifier field [prov-dm-constraints] (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-575: identifier field [prov-dm-constraints] (Friday, 26 October)
• Review of PROV_CONSTRAINTS issues (ISSUE-582, ISSUE-586, ISSUE-587, ISSUE-588) (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-490 (prov-constraints-lc-editorial): PROV-CONSTRAINTS pre-Last Call editorial issues [prov-dm-constraints] (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-576: logical definition and comments on prov-constratins [prov-dm-constraints] (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: on specialization/alternate/membership (ISSUE-525) (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-576: logical definition and comments on prov-constratins [prov-dm-constraints] (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-576: logical definition and comments on prov-constratins [prov-dm-constraints] (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: prov-wg Telcon Agenda Oct. 18, 2012 (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Re: proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/10) (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/10) (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: prov-dm normative sections (ISSUE-495) (Tuesday, 9 October)

Jim McCusker

• Re: alternate of and sambas (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: alternate of and sambas (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: alternate of and sambas (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/10) (Thursday, 11 October)

Khalid Belhajjame

• Re: prov-wg: Vote on Exit Criteria (Monday, 29 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-462 (entity-definition-precision): Definition o entity may be too liberal [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-462 (entity-definition-precision): Definition o entity may be too liberal [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: feedback sought on ISSUE-529, ISSUE-524, ISSUE5-519, ISSUE-523 (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-499: Data Model Section 2.1.1, semantics [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 10 October 2012 (Wednesday, 10 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-516: Data Model Section 5.2.1 [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 3 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-516: Data Model Section 5.2.1 [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 3 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-522: Data Model Section 5.3.4 [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 3 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-513: Data Model Section 5.1.6 [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 3 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-516: Data Model Section 5.2.1 [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 3 October)

Luc Moreau

• Re: Reminder: Review of responses to PROV-CONSTRAINTS public comments (Wednesday, 31 October)
• PROV WG Telecon 2012.11.01 (Wednesday, 31 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-573 (mime-type): mime type registration feedback [prov-n] (Tuesday, 30 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-475: Request to drop "mention" and related elements [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 30 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-462 (entity-definition-precision): Definition o entity may be too liberal [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 30 October)
• Re: confirmation on changes to prov-n (Saturday, 27 October)
• further responses and closed issues in prov-dm (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-575: identifier field [prov-dm-constraints] (Friday, 26 October)
• Fwd: activity delegation (ISSUE-522) (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: acknowledging PROV responses (ISSUE-516) (Thursday, 25 October)
• on specialization/alternate/membership (ISSUE-525) (Thursday, 25 October)
• closing some prov-dm issues (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-568 (hadRole-domain): domain of prov:hadRole [Ontology] (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-463 (freimuth): comments from robert freimuth [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: [PROV-O] Proposed OWL change: Dealing with Issue 568 (hadRole) (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-462 (entity-definition-precision): Definition o entity may be too liberal [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-568 (hadRole-domain): domain of prov:hadRole [Ontology] (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: Dealing with mutable resources (PROV-O in Callimachus) - ISSUE-569 (Monday, 22 October)
• proposed responses to public comments (deadline Wednesday 24th, midnight GMT) (Monday, 22 October)
• ISSUE-475: Request to drop "mention" and related elements (Monday, 22 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-495: ivan's feedback on prov-dm LC [prov-dm] (Monday, 22 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-495: ivan's feedback on prov-dm LC [prov-dm] (Monday, 22 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-495: ivan's feedback on prov-dm LC [prov-dm] (Monday, 22 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-463 (freimuth): comments from robert freimuth [prov-dm] (Monday, 22 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-498: Data Model Table 2 [prov-dm] (Monday, 22 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-462 (entity-definition-precision): Definition o entity may be too liberal [prov-dm] (Monday, 22 October)
• Re: Dealing with mutable resources (PROV-O in Callimachus) - ISSUE-569 (Monday, 22 October)
• Re: prov-dm issues under review (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: prov-dm issues under review (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: reminder about prov exit criteria (Thursday, 18 October)
• PROV-WG telcon minutes (Thursday, 18 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-574 (primer-figure): Update primer overview figure [Primer] (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-496: ivan's feedback on prov-n LC [prov-n] (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/17) (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-574 (primer-figure): Update primer overview figure [Primer] (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: Primary Source again (Re: PROV-ISSUE-518: Data Model Section 5.2.4 ) [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-499: Data Model Section 2.1.1, semantics [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-573 (mime-type): mime type registration feedback [prov-n] (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Compliance with PROV-N (related to PROV-ISSUE-496: ivan's feedback on prov-n LC [prov-n]) (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-496: ivan's feedback on prov-n LC [prov-n] (Tuesday, 16 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-477 (rename toplevel-bundle): rename toplevel-bundle to dataset [prov-n] (Tuesday, 16 October)
• prov-n proposed responses to comments (deadline Thursday 12noon GMT) (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-544: Notation Section 3.7 [prov-n] (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-539: Notation Section 3, EBNF format [prov-n] (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-540: Notation Section 3, structure of documentation [prov-n] (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-546: Notation Section 3.7.4 [prov-n] (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-533: Notation, of attributes [prov-n] (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-538: Notation Section 2.4, example 2 [prov-n] (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-536: Notation Section 2.3 [prov-n] (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-534: Notation Section 2.1 [prov-n] (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-535: Notation Section 2.2 [prov-n] (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-537: Notation Section 2.4 [prov-n] (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-545: Notation Section 3.7.2 [prov-n] (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-546: Notation Section 3.7.4 [prov-n] (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-543: Notation Section 3.5 [prov-n] (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/10) (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-541: Notation Section 3.1.3 [prov-n] (Monday, 15 October)
• prov-n issues closed (Monday, 15 October)
• proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/17) (Monday, 15 October)
• Re: proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/10) (Monday, 15 October)
• scribe required for today, thanks! (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/10) (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/10) (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/10) (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/10) (Thursday, 11 October)
• Re: proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/10) (Thursday, 11 October)
• PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 10 October 2012 (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: prov-dm normative sections (ISSUE-495) (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-530: Data Model Section 5.7.2 (Table 6) [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-482: [external question] bundle IDs on insertion, context [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-482: [external question] bundle IDs on insertion, context [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: prov-dm normative sections (ISSUE-495) (Tuesday, 9 October)
• feedback sought on ISSUE-529, ISSUE-524, ISSUE5-519, ISSUE-523 (Tuesday, 9 October)
• proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/10) (Monday, 8 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-522: Data Model Section 5.3.4 [prov-dm] (Monday, 8 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-521: Data Model Section 5.3.3 [prov-dm] (Monday, 8 October)
• Re: ISSUE-520 response (Monday, 8 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-530: Data Model Section 5.7.2 (Table 6) [prov-dm] (Monday, 8 October)
• Re: Editorial error in the primer (Monday, 1 October)
• Re: Editorial error in the primer (Monday, 1 October)

Miles, Simon

• RE: PROV-ISSUE-410 (prov-primer-review): Feedback on Primer document [Primer] (Tuesday, 30 October)
• RE: prov-wg: Vote on Exit Criteria (Monday, 29 October)
• RE: Comments on the Prov Primer (Monday, 29 October)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-402 (Feedback_SM): Feedback on the feedback from Simon Miles [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core] (Thursday, 25 October)
• RE: Dealing with mutable resources (PROV-O in Callimachus) - ISSUE-569 (Monday, 22 October)
• RE: Dealing with mutable resources (PROV-O in Callimachus) - ISSUE-569 (Monday, 22 October)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-574 (primer-figure): Update primer overview figure [Primer] (Wednesday, 17 October)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-574 (primer-figure): Update primer overview figure [Primer] (Wednesday, 17 October)
• RE: Editorial error in the primer (Tuesday, 16 October)
• RE: proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/10) (Tuesday, 16 October)
• RE: proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/10) (Monday, 15 October)
• RE: proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/10) (Thursday, 11 October)
• RE: proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/10) (Thursday, 11 October)
• RE: proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/10) (Thursday, 11 October)
• RE: proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/10) (Thursday, 11 October)
• RE: Dealing with mutable resources (PROV-O in Callimachus) - ISSUE-569 (Wednesday, 10 October)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-563 (primer-alternates-figure): Primer Section 3.9 Alternates [Primer] (Tuesday, 9 October)
• RE: Editorial error in the primer (Tuesday, 9 October)
• RE: proposed responses to public comments (deadline: Wednesday 10/10) (Tuesday, 9 October)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-530: Data Model Section 5.7.2 (Table 6) [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 9 October)
• RE: feedback sought on ISSUE-529, ISSUE-524, ISSUE5-519, ISSUE-523 (Tuesday, 9 October)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-482: [external question] bundle IDs on insertion, context [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 9 October)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-482: [external question] bundle IDs on insertion, context [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 9 October)

Paolo Missier

• Re: Review of PROV-CONSTRAINTS issues (ISSUE-582, ISSUE-579, ISSUE-585, ISSUE-583) (Monday, 29 October)
• Re: prov-wg: Vote on Exit Criteria (Monday, 29 October)
• 2nd CFP: BigPROV @EDBT 2013 and ProvBench: Managing and Querying Provenance Data at Scale (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Re: Provenance specs: have we lost sight of the goal? (Wednesday, 10 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-563 (primer-alternates-figure): Primer Section 3.9 Alternates [Primer] (Wednesday, 10 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-530: Data Model Section 5.7.2 (Table 6) [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 9 October)

Paul Groth

• Re: Provenance Example for TriG Spec (Tuesday, 30 October)
• prov-wg: Vote on Exit Criteria (Monday, 29 October)
• Re: confirmation on changes to prov-n (Saturday, 27 October)
• prov-wg draft agenda F2F4 (Saturday, 27 October)
• confirmation on changes to prov-n (Saturday, 27 October)
• prov-wg Minutes of the October 25, 2012 Telcon (Saturday, 27 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-556 (time-qualification): public comment: should qualfied and unqualified versions the same [prov-dm-constraints] (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: Syntax checking Turtle examples (ACTION-117) (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: Provenance specs: have we lost sight of the goal? (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: acknowledging PROV responses (ISSUE-516) (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: on specialization/alternate/membership (ISSUE-525) (Thursday, 25 October)
• prov-wg: Telcon Agenda October 25, 2012 (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-576: logical definition and comments on prov-constratins [prov-dm-constraints] (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: prov-wg: Minutes of the October 18, 2012 Telecon (Tuesday, 23 October)
• prov-wg: Minutes of the October 18, 2012 Telecon (Tuesday, 23 October)
• last call for comments on exit criteria (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-462 (entity-definition-precision): Definition o entity may be too liberal [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: proposed responses to public comments (deadline Wednesday 24th, midnight GMT) (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-568 (hadRole-domain): domain of prov:hadRole [Ontology] (Monday, 22 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-463 (freimuth): comments from robert freimuth [prov-dm] (Monday, 22 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-462 (entity-definition-precision): Definition o entity may be too liberal [prov-dm] (Monday, 22 October)
• Re: Dealing with mutable resources (PROV-O in Callimachus) - ISSUE-569 (Monday, 22 October)
• Re: Dealing with mutable resources (PROV-O in Callimachus) - ISSUE-569 (Monday, 22 October)
• Re: Dealing with mutable resources (PROV-O in Callimachus) - ISSUE-569 (Monday, 22 October)
• Revised Exit Criteria - final comments (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: pairs of implementations? (Friday, 19 October)
• pairs of implementations? (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: [PROV-O] Proposed OWL change: Dealing with Issue 568 (hadRole) (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-446: prov:involvee not documented in PROV-O [PROV-O HTML] (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: [PROV-O] Proposed OWL change: Dealing with Issue 568 (hadRole) (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: prov-dm issues under review (Friday, 19 October)
• scribe needed (Thursday, 18 October)
• Re: prov-wg Telcon Agenda Oct. 18, 2012 (Thursday, 18 October)
• Re: Dealing with mutable resources (PROV-O in Callimachus) - ISSUE-569 (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Re: prov-wg Telcon Agenda Oct. 18, 2012 (Wednesday, 17 October)
• prov-n issues under review (Wednesday, 17 October)
• prov-dm issues under review (Wednesday, 17 October)
• prov-wg Telcon Agenda Oct. 18, 2012 (Wednesday, 17 October)
• reminder about prov exit criteria (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-499: Data Model Section 2.1.1, semantics [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 17 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-572: What constraints should we have on ordering of elements within the main complexTypes? [XML Serialization] (Friday, 12 October)
• alternate of and sambas (Thursday, 11 October)
• Revised exit criteria (Thursday, 11 October)
• Dealing with mutable resources (PROV-O in Callimachus) - ISSUE-569 (Wednesday, 10 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-520: Data Model Section 5.3.1 [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 10 October)
• Re: Provenance specs: have we lost sight of the goal? (Wednesday, 10 October)
• Re: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 10 October 2012 (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: Editorial error in the primer (Tuesday, 9 October)
• prov-wg Telcon Minutes October 4, 2012 (Tuesday, 9 October)
• Re: ISSUE-520 response (Monday, 8 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-565 (rdfa-check): Do the suggested way of pointing to provenance work in rdfa [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Sunday, 7 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-565 (rdfa-check): Do the suggested way of pointing to provenance work in rdfa [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Saturday, 6 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-565 (rdfa-check): Do the suggested way of pointing to provenance work in rdfa [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Friday, 5 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-520: Data Model Section 5.3.1 [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 3 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-516: Data Model Section 5.2.1 [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 3 October)
• prov-wg - Telcon Agenda October 3, 2012 (Wednesday, 3 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-516: Data Model Section 5.2.1 [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 3 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-516: Data Model Section 5.2.1 [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 3 October)
• Re: batch 3 (18 issues): proposed responses to public comments (deadline Wednesday Oct 3rd) (Wednesday, 3 October)
• UML and upper case labels (Wednesday, 3 October)
• subactivity resolutions (Wednesday, 3 October)
• ISSUE-520 response (Wednesday, 3 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-565 (rdfa-check): Do the suggested way of pointing to provenance work in rdfa [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Monday, 1 October)

Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker

• PROV-ISSUE-588 (strictly-precedes-irreflexive): It is never specified explicitly that "strictly-precedes" is irreflexive [prov-dm-constraints] (Thursday, 25 October)
• PROV-ISSUE-587 (rdf-analogies): Concerns about analogies to RDF blank nodes/semantics [prov-dm-constraints] (Thursday, 25 October)
• PROV-ISSUE-586 (toplevel-bundle-description): The description of 'toplevel bundle' as 'set of statements not appearing in a named bundle' is unclear [prov-dm-constraints] (Thursday, 25 October)
• PROV-ISSUE-585 (applying-satisfying-constraints): Suggestion to avoid discussing how to 'apply' constraints; clarify what it means to 'satisfy' constraints [prov-dm-constraints] (Thursday, 25 October)
• PROV-ISSUE-584 (merging): The nonstandard/procedurally defined 'merging' operation on terms [prov-dm-constraints] (Thursday, 25 October)
• PROV-ISSUE-583 (equivalent-instances-in-bundles): Questions concerning what it means for applications to treat equivalent instances 'in the same way', particularly in bundles. [prov-dm-constraints] (Thursday, 25 October)
• PROV-ISSUE-582 (document-instance): 'of their respective documents.' should be '... of their respective instances.' [prov-dm-constraints] (Thursday, 25 October)
• PROV-ISSUE-581 (avoid-specifying-algorithm): Suggestion to avoid wording that 'almost requires' using normalization to implement constraints [prov-dm-constraints] (Thursday, 25 October)
• PROV-ISSUE-580 (drop-syntactic-sugar-definitions): Suggestion to drop definitions in section 4.1 since they are not needed if the semantics is defined more abstractly [prov-dm-constraints] (Thursday, 25 October)
• PROV-ISSUE-579 (declarative-fol-specification): Suggestion to replace procedural specification with (equivalent, but shorter and less prescriptive) declarative theory in First-Order Logic [prov-dm-constraints] (Thursday, 25 October)
• PROV-ISSUE-578 (equivalence): Use of "equivalent" incompatible with common uses of the term in logic/mathematics [prov-dm-constraints] (Thursday, 25 October)
• PROV-ISSUE-577 (valid-vs-consistent): Terminology: valid vs. consistent [prov-dm-constraints] (Thursday, 25 October)
• PROV-ISSUE-576: logical definition and comments on prov-constratins [prov-dm-constraints] (Tuesday, 23 October)
• PROV-ISSUE-575: identifier field [prov-dm-constraints] (Monday, 22 October)
• PROV-ISSUE-574 (primer-figure): Update primer overview figure [Primer] (Tuesday, 16 October)
• PROV-ISSUE-573 (mime-type): mime type registration feedback [prov-n] (Monday, 15 October)
• PROV-ISSUE-572: What constraints should we have on ordering of elements within the main complexTypes? [XML Serialization] (Thursday, 11 October)
• PROV-ISSUE-570 (changing resources): How do we deal with resources that change? [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 10 October)
• PROV-ISSUE-571 (changing resources): How do we deal with resources that change? [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 10 October)
• PROV-ISSUE-569 (changing resources): How do we deal with resources that change? [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 10 October)
• PROV-ISSUE-568 (hadRole-domain): domain of prov:hadRole [Ontology] (Monday, 8 October)
• PROV-ISSUE-567 (Link-to-inverse-prop-missing): The link ti the inverse property file is missing in the ontology [PROV-O HTML] (Tuesday, 2 October)
• PROV-ISSUE-566 (fix-images): HTML images still have references to the bundles as named greaphs [PROV-O HTML] (Monday, 1 October)

Reza B'far

• Re: prov-wg: Vote on Exit Criteria (Monday, 29 October)

Reza B'Far (Oracle)

• Re: Provenance specs: have we lost sight of the goal? (Thursday, 11 October)

Satya Sahoo

• Re: prov-wg: Vote on Exit Criteria (Monday, 29 October)

Stephan Zednik

• Updates to PROV-XML Note draft. (Tuesday, 30 October)
• Re: pairs of implementations? (Tuesday, 30 October)
• Re: pairs of implementations? (Monday, 22 October)
• Re: pairs of implementations? (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: [PROV-O] Proposed OWL change: Dealing with Issue 568 (hadRole) (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: [PROV-O] Proposed OWL change: Dealing with Issue 568 (hadRole) (Friday, 19 October)
• Re: [PROV-O] Proposed OWL change: Dealing with Issue 568 (hadRole) (Friday, 19 October)

Stian Soiland-Reyes

• Syntax checking Turtle examples (ACTION-117) (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: Provenance specs: have we lost sight of the goal? (Thursday, 25 October)

Timothy Lebo

• Re: typo "addiition" in prov-o 3.1 editor's draft (Friday, 26 October)
• Re: acknowledging PROV responses (ISSUE-516) (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: on specialization/alternate/membership (ISSUE-525) (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: Provenance specs: have we lost sight of the goal? (Thursday, 25 October)
• Re: Presentation on Prov yesterday (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-568 (hadRole-domain): domain of prov:hadRole [Ontology] (Wednesday, 24 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-568 (hadRole-domain): domain of prov:hadRole [Ontology] (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: [PROV-O] Proposed OWL change: Dealing with Issue 568 (hadRole) (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: [PROV-O] Proposed OWL change: Dealing with Issue 568 (hadRole) (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: last call for comments on exit criteria (Tuesday, 23 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-568 (hadRole-domain): domain of prov:hadRole [Ontology] (Monday, 22 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-462 (entity-definition-precision): Definition o entity may be too liberal [prov-dm] (Monday, 22 October)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-496: ivan's feedback on prov-n LC [prov-n] (Sunday, 21 October)
• Re: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 10 October 2012 (Thursday, 11 October)

Tom De Nies

• Re: prov-wg: Vote on Exit Criteria (Monday, 29 October)
• Re: Provenance specs: have we lost sight of the goal? (Wednesday, 10 October)
• Re: prov-wg - Telcon Agenda October 3, 2012 (Thursday, 4 October)

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 October 2012 18:03:08 UTC