- From: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 10:27:15 +0100
- To: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <EMEW3|3eaefcf839c0dbc8ccf7f8800702c38eo9OARJ08l.moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|508905F3>
Hi all, Another good point. I propose to change the sentence as follow: there must be some underpinning*activity or* activities performing the necessary action*(s)* resulting in such a derivation Luc On 10/25/2012 12:39 AM, Freimuth, Robert, Ph.D. wrote: > # 1.1.15 ISSUE-516 (DerivationAsBundle) > <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-516_.28DerivationAsBundle.29> > > # Section 5.2.1 states, "there must be some underpinning activities > performing the necessary actions resulting in such a derivation". Note > both "activities" and "actions" are plural. The statement > wasDerivedFrom, however, allows only a single activity to be > specified. Is derivation intended to support multiple activities (as > per the text), and if so, are multiple statements necessary (one for > each activity)? The question about derivation as a bundle was based > on the impression that multiple activities might be part of "a > derivation" (as per the text). -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Thursday, 25 October 2012 09:27:51 UTC