W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > October 2012

Re: acknowledging PROV responses (ISSUE-516)

From: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 10:27:15 +0100
Message-ID: <EMEW3|3eaefcf839c0dbc8ccf7f8800702c38eo9OARJ08l.moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|508905F3.3080104@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>


Hi all,

Another good point.

I propose to change the sentence as follow:

there must be some underpinning*activity or* activities performing the 
necessary action*(s)* resulting in such a derivation

Luc

On 10/25/2012 12:39 AM, Freimuth, Robert, Ph.D. wrote:
> # 1.1.15 ISSUE-516 (DerivationAsBundle) 
> <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-516_.28DerivationAsBundle.29> 
>
> # Section 5.2.1 states, "there must be some underpinning activities 
> performing the necessary actions resulting in such a derivation". Note 
> both "activities" and "actions" are plural.  The statement 
> wasDerivedFrom, however, allows only a single activity to be 
> specified.  Is derivation intended to support multiple activities (as 
> per the text), and if so, are multiple statements necessary (one for 
> each activity)?  The question about derivation as a bundle was based 
> on the impression that multiple activities might be part of "a 
> derivation" (as per the text).

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Thursday, 25 October 2012 09:27:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:20 UTC