Dear all, Bob has a point here, and we could add a clarifying sentence. I propose the following: Membership/Specialization/Alternate are not defined as Influence, and therefore do not have an id and attributes. Do I have support for this change to the document? Luc On 10/25/2012 12:39 AM, Freimuth, Robert, Ph.D. wrote: > # 1.1.2 ISSUE-525 (Specialization/Alternate) > <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-525_.28Specialization.2FAlternate.29> > > # I think my comment was misunderstood. Fig 8 in > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html shows > the entity-entity relationship as the more general "wasInfluencedBy" > relationship, which is defined within that figure to have an ID and > attributes (gray box). This is also stated in section 5.3.5. Section > 5.5 defines SpecializationOf, AlternateOf, and MentionOf, all of which > are entity-entity relationships. Therefore, it seems that > specialization is a type of influence and should therefore contain the > ID/attributes pattern. If this is not the case, the text may require > clarification. -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavmReceived on Thursday, 25 October 2012 09:00:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:20 UTC