Re: prov-wg: Vote on Exit Criteria

+1 (IE, CWRU)

Best,
Satya

On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>wrote:

>  +1, with the understanding that "the test cases defined by the working
> group" is a well-defined set with some governance (it can't grow
> indefinitely, for example, and "the group" should somehow be happy that it
> is an adequate set, given that multiple people can potentially contribute
> to it).
>
> --Paolo
>
>
> closed On 29/10/2012 12:37, Paul Groth wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
>  We would now like to vote on the Exit Criteria for Candidate
> Recommendations for our specifications.
>
>  You can find the exit criteria here:
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvCRExitCriteria
>
>  The proposal is as follows:
>
>  The Exit Criteria defined at
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvCRExitCriteria are those that the
> Working Group will propose as those that need to be met for PROV-O, PROV-N,
> PROV-DM and PROV-Constraints to move from Candidate Recommendation to
> Proposed Recommendation.
>
>  Please indicate the support or not for this resolution with a +1, 0, or
> -1 and indicate your institution.
>
>  Thanks
> Paul
>
>
>  --
> --
> Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
> http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
> Assistant Professor
> - Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group |
>   Artificial Intelligence Section | Department of Computer Science
> - The Network Institute
> VU University Amsterdam
>
>
>
> --
> -----------  ~oo~  --------------
> Paolo Missier - Paolo.Missier@newcastle.ac.uk, pmissier@acm.org
> School of Computing Science, Newcastle University,  UKhttp://www.cs.ncl.ac.uk/people/Paolo.Missier
>
>