Re: PROV-ISSUE-565 (rdfa-check): Do the suggested way of pointing to provenance work in rdfa [Accessing and Querying Provenance]

Hi Ivan,

I don't have any current examples in rdfa using these properties. I'm
pretty sure they are fine but I want proof. In particular, I'm
interested in how complicated the mark-up is.

If you want to code up an example in RDFa that would be great :-)

Otherwise, this is a reminder for somebody (i.e. me or graham) to do it.

does that make sense?

cheers
Paul



On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
> (Putting my RDFa hat on:) I do not understand the issue here. Could somebody provide some details?
>
> Ivan
>
> On Sep 27, 2012, at 11:03 , Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>
>> PROV-ISSUE-565 (rdfa-check): Do the suggested way of pointing to provenance work in rdfa [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/565
>>
>> Raised by: Paul Groth
>> On product: Accessing and Querying Provenance
>>
>> PAQ suggests using prov:hasAnchor, prov:hasProvenance etc. It is unclear that these work with RDFa this should be checked
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
--
Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
Assistant Professor
- Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group |
  Artificial Intelligence Section | Department of Computer Science
- The Network Institute
VU University Amsterdam

Received on Monday, 1 October 2012 15:10:22 UTC