- From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 18:05:04 +0200
- To: Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu>
- Cc: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Jim, Interesting comment. I changed subject lines to disconnect it from the other thread. How do you think prov:alternateOf compliments the mappings predicates in skos? Thanks Paul On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 8:53 AM, James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote: >> >> The alternateOf relation is provided mainly for complex scenarios >> involving things that change over time, and is not one of the core >> relationships that casual users of PROV will employ routinely. > > > I would actually like to see the linked data community adopt alternateOf in > place of owl:sameAs for their work. It's a reasonable replacement, as > alternateOf is effectively a superproperty of sameAs. If that happens, it > would be the most-used concept from PROV! This is a separate discussion, but > I think it's important to keep this in mind when we discuss it. > > Jim > -- > Jim McCusker > Programmer Analyst > Krauthammer Lab, Pathology Informatics > Yale School of Medicine > james.mccusker@yale.edu | (203) 785-4436 > http://krauthammerlab.med.yale.edu > > PhD Student > Tetherless World Constellation > Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute > mccusj@cs.rpi.edu > http://tw.rpi.edu
Received on Thursday, 11 October 2012 16:05:38 UTC