W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > October 2012

Re: acknowledging PROV responses (ISSUE-516)

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:11:12 -0400
Cc: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <739EB7F5-141E-432B-A52D-D22A62FDD323@rpi.edu>
To: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>

On Oct 25, 2012, at 5:27 AM, Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:

> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Another good point. 
> 
> I propose to change the sentence as follow:  
> 
> there must be some underpinning activity or activities performing the necessary action(s) resulting in such a derivation

+1

-Tim

> 
> Luc
> 
> On 10/25/2012 12:39 AM, Freimuth, Robert, Ph.D. wrote:
>> 1.1.15 ISSUE-516 (DerivationAsBundle)
>> Section 5.2.1 states, "there must be some underpinning activities performing the necessary actions resulting in such a derivation".  Note both "activities" and "actions" are plural.  The statement wasDerivedFrom, however, allows only a single activity to be specified.  Is derivation intended to support multiple activities (as per the text), and if so, are multiple statements necessary (one for each activity)?  The question about derivation as a bundle was based on the impression that multiple activities might be part of "a derivation" (as per the text).
> 
> -- 
> Professor Luc Moreau
> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
> 
Received on Thursday, 25 October 2012 12:10:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:20 UTC