Re: PROV-ISSUE-568 (hadRole-domain): domain of prov:hadRole [Ontology]

Luc,

On Oct 23, 2012, at 4:11 PM, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:

> Hi Tim,
> 
> I would suggest reordering, with definition first.
> 
> > The _optional_ Role that an Entity assumed in the context of an Activity. For example, :baking prov:used :spoon; prov:qualified [ a prov:Usage; prov:entity :spoon; prov:hadRole roles:mixing_implement ].
> >
> > This property has multiple RDFS domains to suit multiple OWL Profiles. See PROV-O OWL Profile.


Neither of these [comments] is the definition. The definition is at the top (before the example):

[[
A role is the function of an entity or agent with respect to an activity, in the context of a usage, generation, invalidation, association, start, and end.
]]

I do not have [easy] control over the order of the cross reference comments.


> 
> I am fine with this new sentence.
> 
> Can you also add a similar forwarding pointer to atLocation, hadActivity, and wasInfluencedBy?

Yes. I was waiting on confirmation of the wording.

I added the comment to all 4 properties in the OWL file and they now appear in 

http://aquarius.tw.rpi.edu/prov-wg/prov-o#hadRole
http://aquarius.tw.rpi.edu/prov-wg/prov-o#atLocation
http://aquarius.tw.rpi.edu/prov-wg/prov-o#hadActivity
http://aquarius.tw.rpi.edu/prov-wg/prov-o#wasInfluencedBy


Regards,
Tim



> 
> Thanks,
> Luc
> 
> 
> On 23/10/12 19:49, Timothy Lebo wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Good suggestion.
>> 
>> I added the rdfs:comment into the ontology http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/rev/37b3fc2c8796
>> 
>> which appears at http://aquarius.tw.rpi.edu/prov-wg/prov-o#hadRole
>> 
>> Do you have any suggestions on how to word the comment?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Tim
> 
> -- 
> Professor Luc Moreau
> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
> 
> 
>