Re: ISSUE-520 response

Sure will do.

Paul

On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> I am fine with such a  text to be added to the FAQ.
> Could you update the pointer in the response to the FAQ entry when
> you have created it?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Luc
>
> On 10/03/2012 11:01 AM, Paul Groth wrote:
>> Hi Luc, all:
>>
>> I would suggest we add in the FAQ the following:
>>
>> - When should I use prov:Agent subtypes?
>> If you want to denote that some Person, Organization or Software Agent
>> has responsibility for and activity or entity use the subtypes of
>> prov:Agent. Otherwise, we suggest that use other ontologies like FOAF.
>>
>> This could also be added to the response as a proposed change.
>>
>> thoughts?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Paul
>>
>
> --
> Professor Luc Moreau
> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>
>



-- 
--
Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
Assistant Professor
- Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group |
  Artificial Intelligence Section | Department of Computer Science
- The Network Institute
VU University Amsterdam

Received on Monday, 8 October 2012 13:03:18 UTC