- From: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 15:44:15 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Paul, Sorry for the delay. A question: "For each feature, at least two independent implementations have been demonstrated to consume this feature generated by other implementations." Can I confirm that's really what we mean in terms of independence? You indicate the two consumers of feature should be independent. Shouldn't we have independence of consumer and producer of features? An alternative would be: "An interoperability pair consists of an implementation generating a feature and an independent implementation consuming the feature. For each feature, at least two interoperability pairs will have been demonstrated to exist." Luc On 10/17/2012 04:25 PM, Paul Groth wrote: > Hi All, > > As a reminder, we will be voting about the exit criteria for the > recommendations tomorrow, so if you have any comments let me know. See > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvCRExitCriteria > > cheers > Paul > -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2012 14:44:46 UTC