Important - reviewing WCAG 2.1 draft
Depression
no call this week
coga presentations at CSUN
CSUN Meetup for COGA and freinds
SC in WCAG draft
last changes?
CSUN meetup - take 2
Keeping SC text in the pull request description
- Re: Keeping SC text in the pull request description
- can we keep all the converation in the issue. - was Re: Keeping SC text in the pull request description
- RE: can we keep all the converation in the issue. - was Re: Keeping SC text in the pull request description
- Re: can we keep all the converation in the issue. - was Re: Keeping SC text in the pull request description
- Re: can we keep all the converation in the issue. - was Re: Keeping SC text in the pull request description
- can we keep all the converation in the issue. - was Re: Keeping SC text in the pull request description
- Re: Keeping SC text in the pull request description
Survey
call on the wording for the symbols SC tomorrow
CSUN meetup
minutes from today's call
Re: Test of the SC
The Cognitive Accessibility Task Force Teleconference - Monday, February 20, 2017
what are the most important
proposed change for simple words in labels etc.
- Re: proposed change for simple words in labels etc.
- RE: proposed change for simple words in labels etc.
- Re: proposed change for simple words in labels etc.
- Re: proposed change for simple words in labels etc.
Please let us know anyone working on the personlization stuff
Re: PR for issue 39 - Critical controls
User Queries
Please let me know all the problems you have with W3C tools and process
- 48 hours for comments ---- was Re: Please let me know all the problems you have with W3C tools and process
This is significantly different from what was agreed. - was Re: CFC: Manual testing processes
- Re: This is significantly different from what was agreed. - was Re: CFC: Manual testing processes
- Re: This is significantly different from what was agreed. - was Re: CFC: Manual testing processes
CSUN meetup
urgent Urgent
Clear Text and Voice #27
small omission to survey pull request. Please read before voting
Fill in the WCAG Surveys for this week!
The Cognitive Accessibility Task Force Teleconference - Monday, February 13,
- RE: The Cognitive Accessibility Task Force Teleconference - Monday, February 13,
- Re: The Cognitive Accessibility Task Force Teleconference - Monday, February 13,
- Re: The Cognitive Accessibility Task Force Teleconference - Monday, February 13,
- Re: The Cognitive Accessibility Task Force Teleconference - Monday, February 13,
Fwd: Re: How can we help?
Please let me know any agenda items for the coga call.
I have asked for a new process
process for second pull request
How can we help?
Does anyone want a call today?
An important note on the use cases and expertease
when will your pull request be done?
Free Chrome extension for personalization
- Re: Free Chrome extension for personalization
- RE: Free Chrome extension for personalization
- RE: Free Chrome extension for personalization
- RE: Free Chrome extension for personalization
teleconference availability
please comment on the WCAG list or very few of our SC's will be in the WCAG draft (if any)
new wcag survays for today!!
minutes from today's call
please vote in the wcag survay
Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- RE: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- RE: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- RE: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- RE: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- RE: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- RE: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- RE: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- RE: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- RE: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- FW: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- Re: FW: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- Re: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- RE: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- RE: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- Re: FW: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
- RE: Proposals for revision of the Plain Language SC proposals for WCAG 2.1
SC #24, please vote
SC #23, please vote
let me know if you want your SC or related topic on tomorrow's agenda
- Re: let me know if you want your SC or related topic on tomorrow's agenda
- RE: let me know if you want your SC or related topic on tomorrow's agenda