Sounds like a goal for the Rec Katie Haritos-Shea 703-371-5545 On Feb 19, 2017 12:18 PM, "Andrew Kirkpatrick" <akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote: > Gregg, > I agree with that in principle but given that we are not able to make > changes to the requires W3C template quickly we won’t be able to do that > for the FWPD. > > Thanks, > AWK > > Andrew Kirkpatrick > Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility > Adobe > > akirkpat@adobe.com > http://twitter.com/awkawk > > > > > > > > On 2/19/17, 11:47, "Gregg C Vanderheiden" <greggvan@umd.edu> wrote: > > >One of the criteria for a Success Critions is that it is practical to > apply across web content. > > > >Since the WCAG is full of experts at making web pages accessible — it > seems to me that a good test of any SC would be that the WCAG can figure > out how to make any page conform to them. > > Not that we need to start fixing everyone’s pages — but if someone > asserts the proposed SC can’t be met by a page (with minor fix that doesn’t > wreck the functionality) that should be a good indication that the SC would > not meet the test. > > > >AT A MINUMUM - we should be able to make the current draft WCAG 2.1 meet > all of the Level A and AA SC. > > > > > >Gregg C Vanderheiden > >greggvan@umd.edu > > > > > > >
Received on Sunday, 19 February 2017 21:56:42 UTC