Re: call on the wording for the symbols SC tomorrow

Sent from wrong email address for this list. Resending.

On 2/21/2017 8:24 AM, Jeanne Spellman wrote:
> Lisa,
>
> Unfortunately, I have a conflicting meeting for work.  Both work and
> WCAG is reaching a fever pitch for emails and meetings just before CSUN.
> Unfortunately for this call, work has to take priority.
>
> If my work call is short, I will join the call.
>
> David, thanks for the clarification on the verb tense.  We had an
> editorial standard for active voice in UAAG (who had a professional
> editor in the working group), but I will adapt to WCAG editorial
> standards and accept your wording.
>
> Lisa, it's a really good sign if the comments are about the verb tense,
> instead of the key points.  :)
>
> I just have re-read the comments and don't see that we have any
> conflict.  I accept David's edits, so I think you can make a pull
> request from this.  It looks solid, unless we have more work to do
> around the definition of topical pictorial symbol. Has any other group
> worked on this definition?
>
> jeanne
>
> On 2/20/2017 3:59 PM, David MacDonald wrote:
>> I can't make the call but here is my suggestion which I put in the issue
>>
>> @jspellman <https://github.com/jspellman> For a WCAG SC, we can't tell
>> the author to do something. We have to state it as a condition that can
>> be answered true/false. If we want it in the active voice it would have
>> to be something like.
>>
>>     A |<glossary-link>| topical pictorial
>>     symbol|</glossary-link>| or |<glossary-link>|programmatically
>>     determinable semantic markup |</glossary-link>| precedes critical
>>     contents or controls.
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> David MacDonald
>>
>>
>>
>> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
>>
>> Tel:  613.235.4902
>>
>> LinkedIn
>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>>
>> twitter.com/davidmacd <http://twitter.com/davidmacd>
>>
>> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>>
>> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>>
>>
>>
>> /  Adapting the web to *all* users/
>>
>> /            Including those with disabilities/
>>
>> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
>> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 3:40 PM, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com
>> <mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     __
>>     Hi folks
>>
>>     We need to tighten up the definitions for the symbols SC
>>     https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/50
>>     <https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/50>
>>
>>     You can send any suggestions to the list but let us also have a call
>>     4pm Israel
>>     2pm London
>>     9 am East cost US
>>
>>     I know it is early in the US but we need to have any changes ready
>>     before the wcag call tomorow
>>
>>
>>     Access Numbers
>>     USToll-Free 888-426-6840 <tel:(888)%20426-6840>
>>     USCaller Paid215-861-6239 <tel:(215)%20861-6239>
>>     Israel : 1-809-417-783
>>      United KingdomCaller Paid0-20-30596451
>>     United KingdomToll-Free0800-368-0638
>>
>>     Participant Code:    35306683
>>
>>     More numbers (for other countries):
>>
>>
>> https://www.teleconference.att.com/servlet/glbAccess?process=1&accessCode=3315177&accessNumber=8884266840&brand=att&lang=English
>>
>>
>> <https://www.teleconference.att.com/servlet/glbAccess?process=1&accessCode=3315177&accessNumber=8884266840&brand=att&lang=English>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     All the best
>>
>>     Lisa Seeman
>>
>>     LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter
>>     <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
>>
>>
>>
>

Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2017 13:42:41 UTC