Re: last changes?

Is there any way to include the definition, or some version of it, that EA
provided for "significant financial loss?"


Jan McSorley
VP, Accessibility
Psychometrics and Testing Services

400 Center Ridge Drive, Suite E
Austin, TX  78753
M - (512) 673-9569
Twitter: @Jan_McSorley
Skype:  jan.mcsorley
www.linkedin.com/in/janmcsorley

Learn more at pearson.com

[image: Pearson]

*We put a man on the moon in the 1960's ... surely we can make information
technology fully accessible to people with disabilities.  It can be done
... it must be done ... it will be done!*

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:15 PM, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote:

> Jim, Can you put this change in the github issue so we do not lose it for
> the next version
>
>
> All the best
>
> Lisa Seeman
>
> LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
>
>
>
>
> ---- On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:57:35 +0200 *Michael
> Pluke<Mike.Pluke@castle-consult.com <Mike.Pluke@castle-consult.com>>*
> wrote ----
>
> Hi Lisa
>
>
>
> Presumably your comment, which I agree with, refers to these definitions
> in general?
>
>
>
> Jim’s use of brackets instead of commas in a few places doesn’t change the
> definitions, it just makes them easier to read. Your comment applies to the
> originally proposed definitions and Jim’s improved versions.
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
>
>
> Mike
>
> PS There seems to be (at least) two different ways to refer to ,, () and
> []. In my (UK) understanding both the latter two are brackets (round and
> square) and that whether you use commas or brackets you are putting the
> text in between in parenthesis. It seems that in other (US?) understandings
> () are referred to as parentheses. Doing a quick Google search leads to
> much confusion on these namings! My UK-tuned brain had to read all of text
> behind GrammarBook.com’s statement “Parentheses and brackets must never
> be used interchangeably”
> <http://www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/parens.asp> to have any clue what
> they were on about!!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* lisa.seeman [mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com]
> *Sent:* 21 February 2017 16:00
> *To:* Smith <smithjs@atos.net>
> *Cc:* public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
> *Subject:* RE: last changes?
>
>
>
> i think we need the definition to be more testable
>
> such as what is a  significant financial loss
>
>
>
> i guese it will be cleaner for the next verison
>
> All the best
>
> Lisa Seeman
>
> LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
>
>
>
>
> ---- On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 17:10:11 +0200 *Smith<* <smithjs@atos.net>
> smithjs@atos.net*>* wrote ----
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> How do these seem? Mostly the use of parenthesis to help with the “comma
> overload” plus an extension on the loss of rights and freedoms to cover
> people the user is acting on behalf of
>
>
>
> *Important information:*
>
> Information the user may need to complete any action or task (including
> offline tasks); or information related to safety, risk, privacy, health or
> opportunity.
>
>
>
> *Critical service:*
>
> A service that is needed to prevent  significant harm,  loss (such as
> significant financial loss), illness or injury to the user, a deterioration
> in the condition of a patient or the effective loss of rights or freedoms
> of the user or someone the user is acting on the behalf of.
>
>
>
> Jim
>
>
>
> *From:* lisa.seeman [mailto: <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>lisa.seeman@zoho.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 21, 2017 2:47 PM
> *To:* public-cognitive-a11y-tf < <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
> public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
> *Subject:* last changes?
>
>
>
> Hi folks
>
> *Can we tighten up the wording at all for the following*
>
>
>
>
>
> *important information*
>
> information the user may need to complete any action or task including an
> offline task, or related to safety, risks, privacy, health or opportunities
>
>
>
> *critical service*
>
> service that is needed to prevent significant harm, risk or loss such as:
> significant financial loss, illness, injury or deterioration in a patient's
> condition or effective loss of rights or freedoms
>
>
>
> All the best
>
> Lisa Seeman
>
> LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>