please comment on the WCAG list or very few of our SC's will be in the WCAG draft (if any)

Andrew said on the wcag call today that  SC that do not meet all the acceptance criteria left out of this draft . This is an issue that must get consensus. It is horrible for COGA SC's.


If you feel that this is a bad thing then please comment on the WCAG list (not here)
If there is only one or two voices against it, they will feel it do not need to ask for consensus (apparently editors draft do not need consensus)  and they will just leave out most of our SC's.


My proposal was that  SC that address a essential user need should be in the draft for WCAG 2.1 at the end of the month. Even if they  do not have full consensus, and issues that were identified  can be identified as an editors note next to any relevant SC. 



All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn, Twitter