Re: Keeping SC text in the pull request description

Not everyone finds that method very usable.   We use it in our projects all the time — but for many it is not usable .    It may be accessible but not usable.  


Gregg C Vanderheiden
greggvan@umd.edu



> On Feb 20, 2017, at 6:53 PM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote:
> 
> If we stick to pull requests as the place for discussion, then I recommend:
> 
> Keep the up to date SC text & new glossary terms in the description of the pull request.
> 
> That way it is at the top, and (assuming the SC manager does the pull request) it can be kept up to date.
> 
> I had issues on a Resize text where it went through a lot of change, and people were referring to the old version in the issue, which I couldn't update. Frustrating for everyone, so it seems best to keep it up to date at the top of the place it is being discussed.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> -Alastair