W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org > February 2017

Re: process for second pull request

From: Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:58:41 +0000
To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
Cc: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>, Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>, "W3c-Wai-Gl-Request@W3. Org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <86162afc-edec-6c2c-4618-1e2add39ae67@tink.uk>
On 10/02/2017 11:00, Alastair Campbell wrote:
> So long as the SC manager makes the pull request, they should be able to keep the description up to date, e.g:
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/pull/100
> I think that’s the best approach… unless SC managers can’t do the pull request?

The problem is that the discussion is then scattered between the 
original Github issue, n number of PR threads, plus a conference call or 
two and quite possibly some discussion on the email list.

@LeonieWatson tink.uk Carpe diem

> -Alastair
Received on Monday, 13 February 2017 09:59:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:23:58 UTC