W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org > February 2017

RE: please let me know when you have done the pull requests

From: EA Draffan <ead@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 06:37:59 +0000
To: "Thaddeus ." <inclusivethinking@gmail.com>, Michael Pluke <Mike.Pluke@castle-consult.com>
CC: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>, public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <7181A95B72F5B04C94BEF10CEC91E7963EAB49C9@SRV00047.soton.ac.uk>
+1 to what Thad has said below as I am stuck as well. 

I am afraid I cannot move forward on my #51 Visual Presentation as there does not seem to be a right answer to the problem despite Lisa's best attempts and #50 Symbols has a paragraph which is sitting waiting for the next stage, but will probably be considered too complex.   If it should be pushed into a pull request please can someone help but I am not sure it is ready as it has no consensus from other folk.   

Dr Dolittle comes to mind and I am not sure which end of the Llama I am at. 

Best wishes
E.A.





________________________________________
From: Thaddeus . [inclusivethinking@gmail.com]
Sent: 09 February 2017 05:28
To: Michael Pluke; EA Draffan
Cc: lisa.seeman; public-cognitive-a11y-tf
Subject: Re: please let me know when you have done the pull requests

Hi Lisa,

We still need confirmation from someone on how to include first draft
comments in the final Pull Request. Do we still create a branch with
the same issue and number (ISSUE-54 for example)? Do we do something
else.? I feel like we are getting several emails, too many emails,
(not from you) requesting us to do things or telling us we are doing
things wrong or writing SC wrong without much constructive input.





On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Michael Pluke
<Mike.Pluke@castle-consult.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Get Outlook for iOS
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:57 PM +0100, "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Thad
>>
>> I  think we need to reword it so that it is a stand alone SC not a change
>>
>> how about:
>>
>> Consistent positions : Navigational mechanisms that are repeated on
>> multiple Web pages within a set of Web pages occur in the same  position in
>> the overall page layout each time they are repeated, unless a change is
>> initiated by the user.
>>
>>
>>
>> All the best
>>
>> Lisa Seeman
>>
>> LinkedIn, Twitter
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---- On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 16:45:02 +0200 Thaddeus
>> .<inclusivethinking@gmail.com> wrote ----
>>
>> Hi Lisa,
>>
>> I am trying to finalize conversations on mine but I am finding maybe it is
>> not my strong point but will keep engaged. I have an outstanding question
>> for you on the wording of Consistent Navigation. Would you mind taking a
>> look when you get a change and I can possibly make a Pull Request on this:
>>
>> https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/29
>>
>> Consistent Navigation - change wording of SC to:
>>
>> 3.2.3 Consistent Navigation: Navigational mechanisms that are repeated on
>> multiple Web pages within a set of Web pages occur in the same relative
>> order @@ and position in the overall page layout @@ each time they are
>> repeated, unless a change is initiated by the user.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 1:41 AM, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Folks
>> Please let me know when you have done the  pull requests
>> I want to update or status table
>>
>> I wan t
>> All the best
>>
>> Lisa Seeman
>>
>> LinkedIn, Twitter
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Received on Thursday, 9 February 2017 06:38:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:23:58 UTC