xml-dist-app@w3.org from April 2002 by date

Tuesday, 30 April 2002

• RE: Position on issue 194 Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: Position on issue 194 Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Position on issue 194 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Position on issue 194 Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Position on issue 194 Ray Whitmer
• AXIS beta 2 release is available Russell Butek
• RE: Position on issue 194 Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Position on issue 194 Jacek Kopecky
• Position on issue 195 Jacek Kopecky

Monday, 29 April 2002

• Ann: Web Service Description Requirements published Jonathan Marsh
• TBTF streaming proposal Marc Hadley

Saturday, 27 April 2002

• Re: Issue 195: slightly updated simple proposal Ray Whitmer

Friday, 26 April 2002

• Re: SOAP Encoding Schema broken Jacek Kopecky
• Re: SOAP Encoding Schema broken Martin Gudgin
• Re: SOAP Encoding Schema broken Martin Gudgin
• Re: SOAP Encoding Schema broken Jacek Kopecky
• Re: issue #196 closed Jean-Jacques Moreau

Thursday, 25 April 2002

• SOAP Encoding Schema broken Martin Gudgin
• Encryption: Onward and Upward -- Your Response Needed Joseph Reagle
• Modules and Features and URIs, oh my! Glen Daniels
• Re: Fwd: Moving exc-c14n forward: your response is needed! Joseph Reagle
• Re: issue #196 closed Marc Hadley
• Re: Issue 195: slightly updated simple proposal Martin Gudgin
• Re: Issue 195: slightly updated simple proposal Martin Gudgin
• Re: issue #196 closed Christopher Ferris
• Re: Proposal for dealing with root noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Proposal for dealing with root noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: issue #196 closed Jean-Jacques Moreau

Wednesday, 24 April 2002

• Re: Proposal for dealing with root noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Proposal for dealing with root noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• REST and SOAP noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Thursday, 25 April 2002

• Re: Proposal for dealing with root Martin Gudgin
• Re: XMLP Issue 193 Closed Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Issue 195: slightly updated simple proposal Martin Gudgin
• Re: Issue 195: slightly updated simple proposal Martin Gudgin

Wednesday, 24 April 2002

• Re: Issue 195: slightly updated simple proposal Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Issue 195: slightly updated simple proposal Ray Whitmer
• Re: Issue 195: slightly updated simple proposal Martin Gudgin
• RE: Fwd: Moving exc-c14n forward: your response is needed! Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Fwd: Moving exc-c14n forward: your response is needed! Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Issue 195: slightly updated simple proposal Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Issue 195: slightly updated simple proposal Martin Gudgin
• [xml-dist-app] <none> John Ibbotson
• Re: Summary of Issue 194 - encodingStyle Ray Whitmer
• Re: Issue 195: slightly updated simple proposal Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Fwd: Moving exc-c14n forward: your response is needed! Joseph Reagle
• Re: Fwd: Moving exc-c14n forward: your response is needed! Joseph Reagle
• Re: Fwd: Moving exc-c14n forward: your response is needed! Joseph Reagle
• RE: Providing a short name for single-request-response MEP Williams, Stuart
• Re: Providing a short name for single-request-response MEP Mark Baker
• Re: Proposal for dealing with root Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Providing a short name for single-request-response MEP Mark Baker
• Re: Issue 195: slightly updated simple proposal Martin Gudgin
• Re: Proposal for dealing with root Martin Gudgin
• RE: Providing a short name for single-request-response MEP Williams, Stuart
• Re: Proposal for dealing with root noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Providing a short name for single-request-response MEP Mark Baker
• Re: Possible issue on definition of Intermediaries Herve Ruellan
• Re: Providing a short name for single-request-response MEP Christopher Ferris
• Re: mime type for SOAP Encoding XML format Christopher Ferris
• Re: Issue 195: slightly updated simple proposal Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Providing a short name for single-request-response MEP Williams, Stuart
• Re: Proposal for dealing with root Jacek Kopecky
• Re: mime type for SOAP Encoding XML format Jacek Kopecky
• Join us in Orlando! freeoffer@bandfest.com
• Re: Providing a short name for single-request-response MEP Mark Baker
• Re: Summary of Issue 194 - encodingStyle Martin Gudgin
• Re: Providing a short name for single-request-response MEP noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Proposal for dealing with root noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Tuesday, 23 April 2002

• Re: Summary of Issue 194 - encodingStyle Simon Fell

Wednesday, 24 April 2002

• Re: Summary of Issue 194 - encodingStyle Ray Whitmer
• Re: mime type for SOAP Encoding XML format Christopher Ferris
• mime type for SOAP Encoding XML format Dan Brickley

Tuesday, 23 April 2002

• RE: Possible issue on definition of Intermediaries Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: Issue 195: slightly updated simple proposal Ray Whitmer
• RE: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7) Joshua Allen
• Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7) Paul Prescod
• [TBTF] Proposal on streaming of messages and request/responses noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Summary of Issue 194 - encodingStyle Martin Gudgin
• Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7) Paul Prescod
• Re: Providing a short name for single-request-response MEP Mark Baker
• Re: Summary of Issue 194 - encodingStyle Ray Whitmer
• Re: Proposal for closing issue 201 Mark Baker
• Re: Proposal for dealing with root Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Proposal for dealing with root Martin Gudgin
• RE: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7) Anne Thomas Manes
• Re: Proposal for dealing with root Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Providing a short name for single-request-response MEP Williams, Stuart
• Proposal for dealing with root Martin Gudgin
• Re: Proposal for closing issue 201 Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Issue #203 : First draft text Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Possible issue on definition of Intermediaries Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7) Paul Prescod
• RE: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7) Anne Thomas Manes
• Re: Providing a short name for single-request-response MEP Mark Baker
• RE: Providing a short name for single-request-response MEP noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Summary of Issue 194 - encodingStyle Jacek Kopecky

Monday, 22 April 2002

• Re: Summary of Issue 194 - encodingStyle Ray Whitmer
• RE: Issue #203 : First draft text Glen Daniels
• Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7) Paul Prescod
• RE: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7) Anne Thomas Manes
• RE: Summary of Issue 194 - encodingStyle Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: Are QNames in Attribute Values Permitted as Identifiers? noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Summary of Issue 194 - encodingStyle Ray Whitmer
• Re: Summary of Issue 194 - encodingStyle Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Proposal for closing issue 201 Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Possible issue on definition of Intermediaries Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• RE: Fwd: Moving exc-c14n forward: your response is needed! Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Proposal for dealing with issue 200: SOAPAction header vs. ac tion parameter Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• RE: Proposal for closing issue 201 Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: Summary of Issue 194 - encodingStyle Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: Proposal for closing issue 201 Christopher Ferris
• Re: Proposal for closing issue 201 Marc Hadley
• RE: Providing a short name for single-request-response MEP Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• RE: Completing the tables SRR MEP description. noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Proposal for closing issue 201 Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: Proposal for closing editorial issue 193 Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: attributes using soap encoding/RPC Simon Fell

Friday, 19 April 2002

• attributes using soap encoding/RPC Tim Thompson

Monday, 22 April 2002

• Re: Fwd: Moving exc-c14n forward: your response is needed! Martin Duerst

Sunday, 21 April 2002

• RE: Completing the tables SRR MEP description. Eugene Kuznetsov

Saturday, 20 April 2002

• Re: [Fwd: RE: [soapbuilders] Question about root (was Re: PEAR SOAP)] Pete Hendry
• Please remove from list a.chatterjee
• Re: [Issue, March 20th 2002] Serializer vs. De-serializer noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Friday, 19 April 2002

• Re: Fwd: Moving exc-c14n forward: your response is needed! Joseph Reagle
• Resolution of Issue 61 David Fallside
• Please remove from list Grose, Timothy E.
• Re: Providing a short name for single-request-response MEP Christopher Ferris
• Re: [Fwd: RE: [soapbuilders] Question about root (was Re: PEAR SOAP)] Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Providing a short name for single-request-response MEP Williams, Stuart
• Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7) Paul Prescod
• RE: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7) Don Box

Thursday, 18 April 2002

• [Fwd: RE: [soapbuilders] Question about root (was Re: PEAR SOAP)] Pete Hendry
• Re: Providing a short name for single-request-response MEP Christopher Ferris
• Providing a short name for single-request-response MEP Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• RE: Proposal for dealing with issue 200: SOAPAction header vs. ac tion parameter Williams, Stuart
• Re: Proposal for dealing with issue 200: SOAPAction header vs. ac tion parameter Christopher Ferris
• Re: Proposal for dealing with issue 200: SOAPAction header vs. ac tion parameter Mark Baker
• RE: [Issue, March 20th 2002] Locally vs. Globally Scoped Asir S Vedamuthu
• RE: [Issue, March 20th 2002] Does EII represent an edge or node? Asir S Vedamuthu
• RE: Proposal for dealing with issue 200: SOAPAction header vs. ac tion parameter Williams, Stuart
• Re: Proposal for dealing with issue 200: SOAPAction header vs. ac tion parameter Christopher Ferris
• Re: TBTF: DRAFT: revisions to MEP descriptions to address overlapping request response. Marc Hadley
• RE: Proposal for dealing with issue 200: SOAPAction header vs. ac tion parameter Williams, Stuart
• Re: [Issue, March 20th 2002] Does EII represent an edge or node? Martin Gudgin
• Re: Proposal for dealing with issue 200: SOAPAction header vs. action parameter Mark Baker
• Re: [Issue, March 20th 2002] Does EII represent an edge or node? Dan Brickley
• Re: [Issue, March 20th 2002] Does EII represent an edge or node? David Fallside

Wednesday, 17 April 2002

• Fwd: Moving exc-c14n forward: your response is needed! Joseph Reagle
• Re: [Issue, March 20th 2002] Locally vs. Globally Scoped Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Issue 36: Clarify nature of conformance Anish Karmarkar
• RE: Issue 36: Clarify nature of conformance Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• RE: Issue 36: Clarify nature of conformance Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• RE: Issue 36: Clarify nature of conformance Anish Karmarkar
• TBTF: DRAFT: revisions to MEP descriptions to address overlapping request response. Williams, Stuart
• ICE, RSS, SOAP Pauline GUEZENNEC
• SOAP based NMS applications products information Prasad Valmeti

Tuesday, 16 April 2002

• Re: Issue 195: slightly updated simple proposal Pete Hendry
• Re: Issue 195: why not only specify the local name Pete Hendry
• RE: Proposal for dealing with issue 200: SOAPAction header vs. action parameter Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: Proposal for dealing with issue 200: SOAPAction header vs. action parameter Mark Nottingham
• RE: Proposal for dealing with issue 200: SOAPAction header vs. action parameter Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: Proposal for dealing with issue 200: SOAPAction header vs. action parameter Mark Nottingham
• Re: Updated proposal for issue 192 Marc Hadley
• RE: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7) Hutchison, Nigel
• RE: Updated proposal for issue 192 Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Proposal for dealing with issue 200: SOAPAction header vs. action parameter Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• RE: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7) Scott Cantor
• Issue 195: slightly updated simple proposal Jacek Kopecky
• Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7) jones@research.att.com
• Re: Proposal for cleanup of RPC section (issue 195) Jacek Kopecky
• Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7) Keith Moore
• Re: [Issue, March 20th 2002] Does EII represent an edge or node? Martin Gudgin
• RE: Proposal for cleanup of RPC section (issue 195) Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: Issue 195: why not only specify the local name Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Issue 195: why not only specify the local name Pete Hendry
• Re: Proposal for cleanup of RPC section (issue 195) Pete Hendry
• [Issue, March 20th 2002] Does EII represent an edge or node? Asir S Vedamuthu
• Issue 195: why not only specify the local name Jacek Kopecky
• [Issue, March 20th 2002] Locally vs. Globally Scoped Asir S Vedamuthu
• Re: Updated proposal for issue 192 Marc Hadley
• RE: Completing the tables SRR MEP description. Hutchison, Nigel
• [Issue, March 20th 2002] Serializer vs. De-serializer Asir S Vedamuthu
• Re: Proposal for cleanup of RPC section (issue 195) Jacek Kopecky
• Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7) Paul Prescod
• RE: Completing the tables SRR MEP description. Williams, Stuart
• RE: Proposal for cleanup of RPC section (issue 195) Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Summary of Issue 194 - encodingStyle Martin Gudgin
• Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7) Mark Nottingham
• Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7) Tim Bray

Thursday, 1 January 1970

• Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7) Tim Bray

Tuesday, 16 April 2002

• Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7) Edwin Khodabakchian
• Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7) Keith Moore
• Re: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7) Mark Baker
• Issue List Closure David Fallside

Monday, 15 April 2002

• RE: Proposal for cleanup of RPC section (issue 195) Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7) David Orchard
• RE: Summary of Issue 194 - encodingStyle Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• new to xml daniel mcelligott
• "A priori" and the default HTTP binding Mark Baker
• RE: Updated proposal for issue 192 Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• RE: Issue 192 & R803 Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: Issue 192 & R803 Marc Hadley
• RE: Issue 192 & R803 Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: Proposal for closing editorial issue 193 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: Completing the tables SRR MEP description. noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Issue 192 & R803 Marc Hadley
• RE: Completing the tables SRR MEP description. Williams, Stuart
• Exclusive Anna Kournikova Photos Raw Celebs
• Re: Proposal for closing editorial issue 193 Mark Baker
• RE: Issue 36: Clarify nature of conformance Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• RE: Issue 192 & R803 Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

Sunday, 14 April 2002

• Re: Completing the tables SRR MEP description. noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Proposal for closing editorial issue 193 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Proposal for cleanup of RPC section (issue 195) Pete Hendry

Friday, 12 April 2002

• Re: Proposal for closing editorial issue 193 Mark Baker
• Proposal for closing editorial issue 193 Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Completing the tables SRR MEP description. Williams, Stuart
• Re: Issue 36: Clarify nature of conformance Anish Karmarkar
• Re: Proposal for allowing xml:lang on faultstring Martin Gudgin
• Re: Proposal for allowing xml:lang on faultstring Jean-Jacques Moreau
• RE: Proposal for allowing xml:lang on faultstring Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: Misunderstanding of SOAP 1.1 element spec Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Misunderstanding of SOAP 1.1 element spec Joop Stringer
• RE: Issue 36: Clarify nature of conformance Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• RE: Issue 36: Clarify nature of conformance noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: Issue 82 : Proposed resolution Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• RE: Issue 36: Clarify nature of conformance Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

Thursday, 11 April 2002

• Re: Issue: HTTP transcoding [ was: What is W3C's position on RFC 3205? ] Mark Nottingham
• Re: Issue: HTTP transcoding [ was: What is W3C's position on RFC 3205? ] Christopher Ferris
• Re: Issue #203 : First draft text Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM
• Issue: HTTP transcoding [ was: What is W3C's position on RFC 3205? ] Mark Nottingham
• Re: Qualification of Fault children (was RE: Updated proposal for iss ue 192) Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM
• RE: Qualification of Fault children (was RE: Updated proposal for issue 192) Williams, Stuart
• RE: Qualification of Fault children (was RE: Updated proposal for issue 192) Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: Qualification of Fault children (was RE: Updated proposal for iss ue 192) Martin Gudgin
• Re: Qualification of Fault children (was RE: Updated proposal for iss ue 192) Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM
• Re: Proposal for allowing xml:lang on faultstring Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM
• Re: Qualification of Fault children (was RE: Updated proposal for iss ue 192) Martin Gudgin
• Re: Issue #203 : First draft text Christopher Ferris
• Re: Issue #203 : First draft text Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Proposal for allowing xml:lang on faultstring Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Summary of Issue 194 - encodingStyle Jean-Jacques Moreau
• [Fwd: attributes using soap encoding/RPC] Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Qualification of Fault children (was RE: Updated proposal for iss ue 192) Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM

Wednesday, 10 April 2002

• Proposal for allowing xml:lang on faultstring Martin Gudgin

Thursday, 11 April 2002

• Issue #203 : First draft text Glen Daniels
• Re: Qualification of Fault children (was RE: Updated proposal for iss ue 192) Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Summary of Issue 194 - encodingStyle Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Proposal for allowing xml:lang on faultstring Christopher Ferris
• Re: Updated proposal for issue 192 Mark Baker

Wednesday, 10 April 2002

• Re: Proposal for allowing xml:lang on faultstring Martin Gudgin
• Proposal for allowing xml:lang on faultstring Martin Gudgin
• Re: Qualification of Fault children (was RE: Updated proposal for iss ue 192) Martin Gudgin
• Summary of Issue 194 - encodingStyle Martin Gudgin
• Qualification of Fault children (was RE: Updated proposal for iss ue 192) Williams, Stuart
• Re: Remove TOC for Pt2 from Pt1 and Vice Versa ? Christopher Ferris
• Re: Updated proposal for issue 192 Christopher Ferris
• RE: Updated proposal for issue 192 Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM
• Re: Remove TOC for Pt2 from Pt1 and Vice Versa ? John Ibbotson
• RE: Updated proposal for issue 192 Williams, Stuart
• Re: Comments on a read through of part 2 Marc Hadley
• Re: Proposal for cleanup of RPC section (issue 195) Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Comments on a read through of part 2 Martin Gudgin
• New issues? Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Updated proposal for issue 192 Marc Hadley
• Re: Comments on a read through of part 2 Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Updated proposal for issue 192 Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Updated proposal for issue 192 Martin Gudgin
• Re: Updated proposal for issue 192 Christopher Ferris
• Comments on a read through of part 2 Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM

Tuesday, 9 April 2002

• Email Binding Status Mountain, Highland M
• Re: Updated proposal for issue 192 Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM
• Updated proposal for issue 192 Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: Proposal for cleanup of RPC section (issue 195) Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM
• Proposed resolution for issue 29 David Fallside
• Re: Proposal for cleanup of RPC section (issue 195) Marc Hadley
• Re: Proposal for cleanup of RPC section (issue 195) Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Proposal for cleanup of RPC section (issue 195) Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Comments on SOAP 1.2 part 2 Martin Gudgin
• Re: Proposal for cleanup of RPC section (issue 195) Herve Ruellan
• Re: Comments on SOAP 1.2 part 2 John Ibbotson

Monday, 8 April 2002

• Re: Proposal for cleanup of RPC section (issue 195) Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Comments on SOAP 1.2 part 2 Martin Gudgin
• Re: Proposal for cleanup of RPC section (issue 195) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Possible issue on definition of Intermediaries noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Issue 190: closed (default values) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Proposal for cleanup of RPC section (issue 195) Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Proposal for cleanup of RPC section (issue 195) Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM
• Comments on SOAP 1.2 part 2 John Ibbotson
• Re: Issue 195: soap-rpc:result Jacek Kopecky
• Proposal for cleanup of RPC section (issue 195) Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Issue 195: soap-rpc:result Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM
• Re: Issue 195: soap-rpc:result Ray Whitmer
• Re: Comments from a Read-Through of Part 1 Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Issue 190: closed (default values) Jean-Jacques Moreau

Sunday, 7 April 2002

• Re: Issue 195: soap-rpc:result Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Issue 195: soap-rpc:result Jacek Kopecky

Friday, 5 April 2002

• Re: Issue 195: soap-rpc:result Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM
• Re: Comments from a Read-Through of Part 1 Christopher Ferris
• Re: Comments from a Read-Through of Part 1 Marc Hadley
• Re: Comments from a Read-Through of Part 1 Christopher Ferris
• Re: WSDL question Jean-Jacques Moreau
• WSDL question Grahame Grieve
• Re: New issues (was: Comments from a Read-Through of Part 1) Martin Gudgin
• Re: Comments from a Read-Through of Part 1 Martin Gudgin
• Re: Comments from a Read-Through of Part 1 Jean-Jacques Moreau
• New issues (was: Comments from a Read-Through of Part 1) Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Comments from a Read-Through of Part 1 Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Comments from a Read-Through of Part 1 Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Comments from a Read-Through of Part 1 Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM

Thursday, 4 April 2002

• Re: HTTP vs. SOAP intermediaries Grahame Grieve
• RE: Is it possible? Joseph Hui
• Is it possible? mauryx@supereva.it
• log of 4/4/02 TBTF call IRC minutes Christopher Ferris
• "Chameleon" Mark Baker
• Re: [TBTF] proposed edits for incorporating conneg feature for HT TP binding Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: HTTP vs. SOAP intermediaries Jim Dixon
• HTTP vs. SOAP intermediaries Mark Baker
• Re: FW: TBTF: Proposal for issue 196 Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Issue 192 & R803 Marc Hadley
• Re: [TBTF] proposed edits for incorporating conneg feature for HT TP binding Marc Hadley
• RE: [TBTF] proposed edits for incorporating conneg feature for HT TP binding Williams, Stuart
• RE: sender/receiver ids transmitted within xml documents... Mike Dierken

Wednesday, 3 April 2002

• Re: Possible issue on definition of Intermediaries Grahame Grieve
• Re: Summarizing the last 192 discussion Grahame Grieve
• Re: Issue 192 & R803 Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM
• Re: Summarizing the last 192 discussion Mark Baker
• Re: Issue 192 & R803 Mark Baker
• RE: [TBTF] proposed edits for incorporating conneg feature for HTTP binding Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• RE: [TBTF] proposed edits for incorporating conneg feature for HT TP binding Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM
• RE: more Re: Issue 192 & R803 Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• RE: Issue 192 & R803 Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: SOAP headers for xmldsig and xenc Martin Gudgin
• SOAP headers for xmldsig and xenc Joseph Reagle
• RE: [TBTF] proposed edits for incorporating conneg feature for HT TP binding Williams, Stuart
• Re: FW: TBTF: Proposal for issue 196 David Crowley
• Re: [TBTF] proposed edits for incorporating conneg feature for HTTP binding Christopher Ferris
• Re: Issue 195: soap-rpc:result Ray Whitmer
• Re: [TBTF] proposed edits for incorporating conneg feature for HT TP binding noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• New topic for XML forum Joko Ruwhof
• Re: Issue 192 & R803 Martin Gudgin
• Re: Faultactor or faultnode? Martin Gudgin
• Re: more Re: Issue 192 & R803 Martin Gudgin
• Re: Issue 192 & R803 Martin Gudgin
• more Re: Issue 192 & R803 Christopher Ferris
• Re: Issue 192 & R803 Christopher Ferris
• RE: Issue 192 & R803 Glen Daniels
• Re: Issue 192 & R803 Marc Hadley
• Re: Issue 192 & R803 Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Issue 192 & R803 Martin Gudgin
• Re: [TBTF] proposed edits for incorporating conneg feature for HT TP binding Jean-Jacques Moreau
• RE: [TBTF] proposed edits for incorporating conneg feature for HT TP binding Williams, Stuart
• Re: Issue 192 & R803 Christopher Ferris
• Re: Issue 195: soap-rpc:result Herve Ruellan
• Re: Possible issue on definition of Intermediaries Bob Cunnings
• Re: [TBTF] proposed edits for incorporating conneg feature for HT TP binding Christopher Ferris
• Re: Faultactor or faultnode? amr.f.yassin@philips.com
• Re: faultactor Glen Daniels
• RE: Faultactor or faultnode? Williams, Stuart
• RE: [TBTF] proposed edits for incorporating conneg feature for HT TP binding Williams, Stuart
• Possible issue on definition of Intermediaries Herve Ruellan
• Re: Issue 192 & R803 Marc Hadley
• Re: Faultactor or faultnode? Marc Hadley
• Re: [TBTF] proposed edits for incorporating conneg feature for HT TP binding Marc Hadley
• Re: [TBTF] proposed edits for incorporating conneg feature for HT TP binding Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: [TBTF] proposed edits for incorporating conneg feature for HT TP binding Christopher Ferris
• Re: Faultactor or faultnode? Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Faultactor or faultnode? Christopher Ferris
• Re: Faultactor or faultnode? Martin Gudgin
• Faultactor or faultnode? Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Issue 195: soap-rpc:result Jacek Kopecky
• RE: [TBTF] proposed edits for incorporating conneg feature for HT TP binding Williams, Stuart
• Re: New (?) issue : SOAP module specifications Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Summarizing the last 192 discussion Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Summarizing the last 192 discussion Mark Baker
• RE: Summarizing the last 192 discussion Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• RE: Summarizing the last 192 discussion Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• FW: TBTF: Proposal for issue 196 Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Resolution of Issue 191 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Summarizing the last 192 discussion Mark Baker
• Re: using xsi:type with the SOAP encoding rules noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Second Workshop on Industrial Experiences with Systems Software (WIESS '02) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: [TBTF] proposed edits for incorporating conneg feature for HTTP binding Christopher Ferris
• RE: Issues 12 & 192 (long) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Tuesday, 2 April 2002

• RE: Summarizing the last 192 discussion Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: Summarizing the last 192 discussion Mark Baker
• RE: Summarizing the last 192 discussion noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: New (?) issue : SOAP module specifications Mark Nottingham
• Re: IP, TCP/UDP as XML App Jim Dixon
• Re: New (?) issue : SOAP module specifications Jacek Kopecky
• IP, TCP/UDP as XML App amr.f.yassin@philips.com
• RE: Issue 189: closed noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• SOAPAction header vs. action parameter Mark Baker

Monday, 1 April 2002

• RE: T is for Transfer Don Box
• RE: T is for Transfer Joseph Hui
• Re: T is for Transfer Mark Baker
• RE: T is for Transfer Joseph Hui
• [TBTF] proposed edits for incorporating conneg feature for HTTP binding Christopher Ferris
• RE: T is for Transfer Don Box
• Re: Summarizing the last 192 discussion Mark Baker
• RE: Summarizing the last 192 discussion Williams, Stuart
• Re: Summarizing the last 192 discussion Christopher Ferris
• Re: Summarizing the last 192 discussion Grahame Grieve
• RE: T is for Transfer Vinoski, Stephen

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 April 2002 17:04:05 UTC