RE: Issue 36: Clarify nature of conformance

Sounds good - thanks!

Henrik 

>The intend was to make it absolutely clear to the reader that the doc
>does not define what it means to be 1.2 compliant, and where the reader
>should go to figure that out. I think a lot of people will look at the
>test suite to figure out conformance issues.
>
>How about:
>
>"An implementation may be said to be SOAP 1.2 conformant if and only if
>it satisfies the conformance requirements specified in SOAP 1.2
>specification. The W3C does not at this time provide for any
>comprehensive means of testing for such conformance."

Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2002 15:35:27 UTC