Re: Remove TOC for Pt2 from Pt1 and Vice Versa ?

YABW

+1

John Ibbotson wrote:

> +1
> During my read through at the new year I thought those sections were
> clumsy.
> John
> 
> Emerging ebusiness Industry Architecture ,
> XML Technology and Messaging,
> IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park,
> Winchester, SO21 2JN
> 
> Tel: (work) +44 (0)1962 815188        (home) +44 (0)1722 781271
> Fax: +44 (0)1962 816898
> Notes Id: John Ibbotson/UK/IBM
> email: john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>                      Marc Hadley
>>                      <marc.hadley@sun.com>          To:
>>
> w3c-xml-protocol-wg@w3.org
> 
>>                      Sent by:                       cc:
>>                      w3c-xml-protocol-wg-req        Subject:  Remove TOC
>>
> for Pt2 from Pt1 and Vice Versa ?
> 
>>                      uest@w3.org
>>
>>
>>                      04/10/2002 12:31 PM
>>                      Please respond to Marc
>>                      Hadley
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>All,
>>
>>I'd like to propose that we remove the current text that lists the
>>contents of part 2 in part 1 and vice versa and replace it with a simple
>>reference so people know the other part exists and where to find it. I
>>would also add a note that part 2 depends on part 1.
>>
>>I think this will make the abstract and intro much cleaner and reduce
>>the amount of duplication between the two parts.
>>
>>Thoughts ?
>>Marc.
>>
>>--
>>Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
>>XML Technology Centre, Sun Microsystems.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Received on Wednesday, 10 April 2002 10:42:24 UTC