- From: Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 15:42:20 +0100
- To: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- CC: "xml-dist-app@w3.org" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
+1 Marc. Jean-Jacques Moreau wrote: > I hate to bring this one to the list... but, in the interest of > coherency, I would like to suggest that we rename "faultactor" to > "faultnode". > > Jean-Jacques. > > > Background > -------------- > Frequency of the word "actor": 0 occurrences (part 1) > Frequency of the word "node": 135 occurrences (part 1) > > Definition for "faultactor" [1] (excerpt): "The value of the > faultactor element information item is the URI that identifies > the SOAP node that generated the fault." > > Quote from Chris [2]: "If the intent (as I understand from 4.4.3 > [Now 5.4.3]) is to identify the source node of the Fault, then it > would be my recommendation that the element be renamed so as to > infer that semantic intent,. e.g. faultnode." > > > [1] > http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/1/10/11/soap12-part1.html#faultactorelement > > [2] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Feb/0007.html > > -- Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com> XML Technology Centre, Sun Microsystems.
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2002 09:42:27 UTC