- From: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 17:17:09 -0400
- To: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
- Cc: Ray Whitmer <rayw@netscape.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
Jacek Kopecky writes: >> * In the array representation of the response, >> the return value outbound edge is the first >> member of the array if the return value of the >> procedure is non-void. The return value outbound >> edge MUST NOT be present if the return value of >> the procedure is void, therefore the first edge >> is the first [out] or [in/out] parameter. Is it intentional that when modeling a function with positional [out] arguments, we cannot reliably determine whether the return value is void unless we have external knowledge of the method signature and the number of arguments expected? For a function taking a variable number of arguments, it would seem to be impossible to determine in general whether the return value was void. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036 IBM Corporation Fax: 1-617-693-8676 One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 ------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 8 April 2002 17:48:00 UTC