- From: Eugene Kuznetsov <eugene@datapower.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 15:02:16 -0400
- To: "Hutchison, Nigel" <Nigel.Hutchison@softwareag.com>, <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
I too am unsure of why large POST & large response would be considered harmful, unusual or strange. \\ Eugene Kuznetsov \\ eugene@datapower.com \\ DataPower Technology, Inc. > -----Original Message----- > From: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org [mailto:xml-dist-app-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of Hutchison, Nigel > Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 7:58 AM > To: 'noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com' > Cc: 'xml-dist-app@w3.org' > Subject: RE: Completing the tables SRR MEP description. > > > I can't say how rare having a large POST overlapping with a large response > is or how buggy stacks are - but the HTTP interface to Tamino > exploits this > and Internet Explorer supports this without problems. This involves Apache > and IIS as web servers. So this behaviour is not mythical > > > Nigel W.O Hutchison > Chief Scientist, W3C AC Representative > Software AG > Uhlandstr 12, D-64297 Darmstadt, Germany > Tel +49 6151 92 1207 > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com [mailto:noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com] > > Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 4:18 PM > > To: Williams, Stuart > > Cc: Williams, Stuart; 'xml-dist-app@w3.org' > > Subject: RE: Completing the tables SRR MEP description. > > > > > > > > I strongly feel that the default binding should not put such a tricky > > burden on the clients. Even though HTTP in prinicple always > > allows it, in > > practice it's rare to have a large POST overlapped with a > > large response. > > I bet that many stacks are buggy in this area or don't even > > try. > > > >
Received on Sunday, 21 April 2002 14:56:33 UTC