RE: Completing the tables SRR MEP description.

I too am unsure of why large POST & large response would be considered
harmful, unusual or strange.

\\ Eugene Kuznetsov
\\ eugene@datapower.com
\\ DataPower Technology, Inc.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org [mailto:xml-dist-app-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of Hutchison, Nigel
> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 7:58 AM
> To: 'noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com'
> Cc: 'xml-dist-app@w3.org'
> Subject: RE: Completing the tables SRR MEP description.
>
>
> I can't say how rare having a large POST overlapping with a large response
> is or how buggy stacks are - but the HTTP interface to Tamino
> exploits this
> and Internet Explorer supports this without problems. This involves Apache
> and IIS as web servers. So this behaviour is not mythical
>
>
> Nigel W.O Hutchison
> Chief Scientist, W3C AC Representative
> Software AG
> Uhlandstr 12,  D-64297 Darmstadt, Germany
> Tel +49 6151 92 1207
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com [mailto:noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com]
> > Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 4:18 PM
> > To: Williams, Stuart
> > Cc: Williams, Stuart; 'xml-dist-app@w3.org'
> > Subject: RE: Completing the tables SRR MEP description.
> >
> >
> >
> > I strongly feel that the default binding should not put such a tricky
> > burden on the clients.  Even though HTTP in prinicple always
> > allows it, in
> > practice it's rare to have a large POST overlapped with a
> > large response.
> > I bet that many stacks are buggy in this area or don't even
> > try.
> >
> >

Received on Sunday, 21 April 2002 14:56:33 UTC