- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 10:36:11 -0400
- To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@uk.sun.com>
Henrik, On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 08:52:51AM -0700, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote: > "An ultimate SOAP receiver MUST correctly process the immediate children > of the SOAP body (see 5.3 SOAP Body). However, Part 1 of this > specification (this document) mandates no particular structure or > interpretation of these elements, and provides no standard means for > specifying the processing to be done." With regards to my last message about the HTTP responses not always being a result of processing, I actually think that we should be quite clear to identify - not just here, but everywhere - that the meaning of the word "process" may be different than the meaning of the word in the underlying protocol. HTTP and the 202 response status code could be used as an example. MB -- Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. mbaker@planetfred.com http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.planetfred.com
Received on Tuesday, 23 April 2002 10:40:02 UTC