- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 15:30:10 +0200 (CEST)
- To: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- cc: "xml-dist-app@w3.org" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
+1
Jacek Kopecky
Senior Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox)
http://www.systinet.com/
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Jean-Jacques Moreau wrote:
> I hate to bring this one to the list... but, in the interest of
> coherency, I would like to suggest that we rename "faultactor" to
> "faultnode".
>
> Jean-Jacques.
>
>
> Background
> --------------
> Frequency of the word "actor": 0 occurrences (part 1)
> Frequency of the word "node": 135 occurrences (part 1)
>
> Definition for "faultactor" [1] (excerpt): "The value of the
> faultactor element information item is the URI that identifies
> the SOAP node that generated the fault."
>
> Quote from Chris [2]: "If the intent (as I understand from 4.4.3
> [Now 5.4.3]) is to identify the source node of the Fault, then it
> would be my recommendation that the element be renamed so as to
> infer that semantic intent,. e.g. faultnode."
>
>
> [1]
> http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/1/10/11/soap12-part1.html#faultactorelement
>
> [2]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Feb/0007.html
>
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2002 08:30:13 UTC