- From: David Fallside <fallside@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 17:00:41 -0700
- To: asirv@webmethods.com
- Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Asir, the WG discussed this question today and was in agreement with Martin's response. Do you agree? ............................................ David C. Fallside, IBM Ext Ph: 530.477.7169 Int Ph: 544.9665 fallside@us.ibm.com |---------+-----------------------------> | | "Martin Gudgin" | | | <martin.gudgin@btc| | | onnect.com> | | | Sent by: | | | xml-dist-app-reque| | | st@w3.org | | | | | | | | | 04/16/2002 05:38 | | | AM | | | | |---------+-----------------------------> >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | To: <asirv@webmethods.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org> | | cc: | | Subject: Re: [Issue, March 20th 2002] Does EII represent an edge or node? | | | | | >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| This has been discussed at some length on this list ( see the thread at[1] ). I do not find it incohrent to state that an EII can represent both an outbound edge and the node that edge terminates at. Gudge [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Mar/0115.html ----- Original Message ----- From: "Asir S Vedamuthu" <asirv@webmethods.com> To: <xml-dist-app@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 1:08 PM Subject: [Issue, March 20th 2002] Does EII represent an edge or node? > I raised this issue on March 20th, 2002 [1]. Original text is, > > "[Comment F] Section 3.1.5, rule 1, "if the element information item > representing the graph node .. " - it contradicts with section 3.1.1 (says > that EII represents an edge)" > > In brief, does the EII represent an edge or node? I believe that it > represents an edge. > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Mar/0193.html > > Regards, > > Asir S Vedamuthu > > webMethods, Inc. > 703-460-2513 or asirv@webmethods.com > http://www.webmethods.com/ >
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2002 20:02:27 UTC