Re: Issue 195: why not only specify the local name

• From: Pete Hendry <peter.hendry@capeclear.com>
• Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 10:43:18 +1200
• To: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
• CC: xml-dist-app@w3.org
• Message-ID: <3CBCA906.9010608@capeclear.com>

>So to clarify - my proposal [2] is to keep the fully qualified
>name rpc:result for return value accessor or remove the notion of
>a return value. My email you responded to was meant to say why we
>should not accept the original proposal by Tim Ewald in issue 195
>description.
>
I think we're agreeing then if we keep the rpc:result.

Pete

Received on Tuesday, 16 April 2002 18:42:52 UTC