- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 09:27:02 -0700
- To: "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>
- Cc: "Martin Gudgin" <marting@develop.com>, "Christopher Ferris" <chris.ferris@sun.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
>Looks that way, to me this is a subtle change in semantics, the first >version says that the body of a fault message can only have >one fault in >the body but says nothing about any other EIIs in the body, the second >that the body can only have one fault and no accompanying EIIs. We >should be careful when incorporating comments like this that we don't >subvert the WG process... Yes, I absolutely agree - good thing that this is now a part of a proposal so that it is being called out! Henrik
Received on Monday, 15 April 2002 12:27:34 UTC