- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 21:37:26 -0800
- To: "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>
- Cc: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
>Now I'm confused. 8-/ I used to believe this, when I thought that >faultHint was authoritative, but now I wonder how you could say that >when, AFAICT, nowhere in the binding does it distinguish between a >fault received on a 200 response, and one received on a 500 response. >Both end up in the success state, and only the faultHint distinguishes >one from the other. I thought we said that the former is simply broken - it won't happen if the implementation is conformant with the SOAP HTTP binding? >> FWIW, I don't think the >> notion of a fault-hint is useful and would be happy with it not being >> there. > >Woohoo, agreement! 8-) Henrik
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2002 00:37:33 UTC